Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ASRE-931: Add new variable shareProcessNamespace #381

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sho-equativ
Copy link

What

This PR introduces the shareProcessNamespace field in the PodSpec. When enabled, this feature allows all containers within a pod to share the same process namespace. This means containers can view and interact with each other's processes, enhancing communication and debugging capabilities between containers in the same pod.

How

  • Added the shareProcessNamespace field to the PodSpec structure.
  • Updated the pod creation logic to check for this field and configure the process namespace accordingly.
  • Adjusted the container runtime settings to support shared process namespaces.
  • Included tests to verify that containers can indeed share the process namespace when the field is enabled.
  • Updated documentation to explain how to use shareProcessNamespace in PodSpec.

Can this PR be safely reverted and rolled back?

  • [X ] YES 💚
  • NO ❌

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 6, 2025

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
0 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

❌ sho-equativ
❌ sho34215
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Your branch is not currently up-to-date with main. Please update your branch before attempting to snapshot your PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants