Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(interactive): Support real long_text data type in storage #4368

Open
zhanglei1949 opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

feat(interactive): Support real long_text data type in storage #4368

zhanglei1949 opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@zhanglei1949
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently for LongText data type, we implement it via a VAR_CHAR(256). However, we should be able to support a real LongText implementation.

@zhanglei1949 zhanglei1949 self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
@longbinlai
Copy link
Collaborator

And, make sure the current users know they are actually using VAR_CHAR(256)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @zhanglei1949, this issus/pr has had no activity for for a long time, could you folks help to review the status ?
To suppress further notifications,

  • for issues,
    • if it is waiting for further response from the reporter/author, please help to add the label requires-further-info,
    • if you have already started working on it, please add the label work-in-progress to the issue,
    • if this issue requires further designing discussion and not in current plan, or won't be fixed, please add the label requires-further-discussion or wontfix to the issue,
  • for pull requests,
    • if you are still working on it and it is not ready for reviewing, please convert this pull request as draft PR,
    • if you have decided to hold this development on, please add the requires-further-discussion label to the pull request.
      Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants