Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create better ux for gas estimation #61

Open
4 tasks
sahith-narahari opened this issue Apr 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
4 tasks

Create better ux for gas estimation #61

sahith-narahari opened this issue Apr 19, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@sahith-narahari
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Currently we don't have a clean way to help users with how gas prices are fluctuating on a chain. It would be nice to be able to provide a user friendly interface which helps with understanding transaction costs. This will also help in estimating revenues in fee across various chains.

Problem Definition

Improve the user flow and available metrics for gas prices and transaction costs. We should be able to provide the necessary information to serve on a web ui like the eth gas station(https://ethgasstation.info/)

Proposal

We need to get gas-prices on chain, which can be done only for validators as of now. We need to make gas price of validators on chain(stored as part of validator information) rather than the current off chain value set on a node. We can offer apis to give metrics on gas usages across various transaction at a later stage.


For Admin Use

  • Not duplicate issue
  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Appropriate contributors tagged
  • Contributor assigned/self-assigned
@hxrts
Copy link
Contributor

hxrts commented Apr 19, 2021

This would ultimately be solved via an implementation of EIP-1559. See the following discussions:

cosmos/cosmos-sdk#8224
cosmos/cosmos-sdk#9072

If you would like to join the weekly calls on this subject I'm happy to add you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants