We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Users where trying to move NAM before phase 5 as it was selectable
Sorry, something went wrong.
Currently we are checking for this with asset.display === "nam"
asset.display === "nam"
We should have a consistent way to check for NAM asset in the whole Namadillo.
A suggestion is to use the isNamAsset from #1292 and deleting the namadaAsset to avoid inconsistencies across chains
isNamAsset
namadaAsset
euharrison
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: