esp32s3_partition.c: Appease a compiler warning (-Wdiscarded-qualifiers)

[yamt]

Summary

esp32s3_partition.c: Appease a compiler warning (-Wdiscarded-qualifiers)

Impact

no functionality changes are intended.

Testing

build tested.

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

Fill In The Commit Message: This PR contains a Commit with an Empty Commit Message. Please fill in the Commit Message with the PR Summary.

No. The PR is missing crucial information required by the NuttX guidelines. While it addresses the "what" (fixing a compiler warning), it lacks sufficient detail in almost all other areas.

Here's what's missing:

• Summary: Needs more detail. Which compiler warning? What was the exact warning message? Which part of esp32s3_partition.c was modified? How was the warning addressed?

• Impact: While stating "no functionality changes," it needs to explicitly answer all the impact questions with "NO" or a "YES" with a description. Even if the answer is no, explicitly stating it ensures thorough review. For example:

  • Impact on user: NO
  • Impact on build: NO (except for the removal of the warning message)
  • ...and so on for all impact categories.

• Testing: "build tested" is insufficient. Provide details as requested:

  • Build Host(s): Specify the OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version used for testing.
  • Target(s): Specify the target architecture (e.g., sim, esp32s3). If using a simulator, which one? If hardware, specify the board and configuration.
  • Testing logs: "your testing logs here" is a placeholder. Include actual build logs (or relevant snippets) before and after the change. Showing the warning disappearing is key. If applicable, show that the functionality remains unchanged through runtime testing.

In short, the PR needs to be significantly expanded to provide the necessary context and evidence for reviewers to properly assess the change.