You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The values for fixed_log2_rowshere were decreased from 20 to 19 upstream v1.0.6-testnet (and again at v1.0.7-testnet), but this breaks the test test_permutation_challenges in Sphinx, so we kept it at 20
Setting it to 19 does not break E2E Plonk proof generation however, in fact with it at 20 it prints the warning "WARN fixed log2 rows can be potentially reduced: got 394238, expected 1048576". We should double-check why test_permutation_challenges is failing with a lower size
Running a quick test benchmark with 19 vs 20 showed no meaningful difference in total proving time, but this number changes how big the final gnark circuit is, so we'll want to decrease it as much as possible
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The values for
fixed_log2_rows
here were decreased from 20 to 19 upstream v1.0.6-testnet (and again at v1.0.7-testnet), but this breaks the testtest_permutation_challenges
in Sphinx, so we kept it at 20Setting it to 19 does not break E2E Plonk proof generation however, in fact with it at 20 it prints the warning "WARN fixed log2 rows can be potentially reduced: got 394238, expected 1048576". We should double-check why
test_permutation_challenges
is failing with a lower sizeRunning a quick test benchmark with 19 vs 20 showed no meaningful difference in total proving time, but this number changes how big the final gnark circuit is, so we'll want to decrease it as much as possible
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: