You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This may due to the Nelder-Mead algorithm trimming to the wrong local minimum.
Is it possible to apply more lateral constraints when trimming?
e.g.
for straight and level flight - roll angle, yaw angle, roll rate and yaw rate all zero.
for steady turning flight - no lateral acceleration felt by crew - i.e sideslip bubble is zero. ( also met by required bank angle is a function of desired rate of turn and speed.)
for steady sideslip and asymmetric engine out, - yaw rate, roll rate both zero
When trimming 0.2 rad/s yawrate, does not actually turn when running simulate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: