Rules and best practices for adding content and labels to Channel

[ipaleka]

Some of the labels for issues are created:

• bug
  Something isn't working on the ASA Stats website
• feature
  Request for a feature to be implemented in the ASA Stats website
• question
  Further information is requested
• research
  Algorand project that needs to be researched before implementation
• suggestion
  An idea for something that isn't directly a website's feature
• task
  Something should be done by the community
• addressed
  Functionality that has been implemented
• archived
  Addressed and closed issue changes to archived after being rewarded
• high priority
  This should be done as soon as possible
• medium priority
  This should be done in a reasonable amount of time
• low priority
  This should be done when there would be spare time

Those pretty much follow what we have already got.

We should define labels and/or title prefixes for the discussions too. If you create a discussion about editing Goals wiki, what the title should be:

a) [Wiki] Goals
b) General discussion for the Goals wiki page
c) ...

We should define Categories for discussions, should we have wiki page discussion as a category?

After some time we should also know what to do with general discussions, for example should we have a counterpart for Discord's #organizational-discussions channel or we should insist on a distinct thread for every topic.

[ipaleka]

We should define Categories for discussions

C'mon guys, shoot your ideas about this. Check the existing discussions and contemplate which set of labels can cover the existing ones and those that will emerge in the future.

For example, @moloch10 used the "Idea" label correctly so we'd be good leaving that one.