"Expansion of governance and established criteria for inclusion "

[Babbexx22]

Suggestions are welcome!

[Babbexx22]

I'd equally suggest we think out ways to include investors in the governance.. Since only a fraction (the already established governors) cannot entirely make a DAO, in the real sense.. I'm saying there's need for expansion so as to encapsulate the teeming populace of Asastats Advocates and faithful communities.
I've seen a host of project define their DAO and its inclusion criteria by set amounts of token. We could equally work on such reasonable minimum amount that shall qualify serious minded investors for inclusion in the governance.

[ipaleka]

Since only a fraction (the already established governors) cannot entirely make a DAO, in the real sense..

They surely can. For the decent functioning of DAO that diversity we have got is absolutely beautiful and perfectly defines what DAO is or what it should be if you ask me.

I'm saying there's need for expansion so as to encapsulate the teeming populace of Asastats Advocates and faithful communities.

Those 30 governors from the ASA Stats community are the most genuine representatives any project on the face of Earth can wish for itself. Any enlargement from inside the community cannot improve that base. After a month or two, the community for sure will produce some other members ready to become governors, but right now those 30 are quite enough and they suffice afaic.

I've seen a host of project define their DAO and its inclusion criteria by set amounts of token. We could equally work on such reasonable minimum amount that shall qualify serious minded investors for inclusion in the governance

Ok. Let me ask you a question: why would some investor be eager to get their seat right now in some DAO that maybe won't start in 2022.?

[RanTask]

My interest as an investor is to make a return on my investment. I want my investment to be protected against dilution. No one should get tokens for free or at a lower price than what the pre-sale investors have been offered without offering pre-sale investors the same deal. So if you are free-handedly awarding voting rights and free tokens to new outsiders then you should at least offer the same deal to anyone who is already invested. These are fairly standard venture capital rules of play and I am puzzled to have to even discuss them to be honest.

[ipaleka]

#1 (reply in thread)

[Bankshelby]

Just as babbex as suggested I'm equally thinking if decisions should only be taken by asastats governors alone.

Why not make asastats token owners feel among with some voting decisions in the future. The delicate ones should be for governors but some should be decided among the community too. The importance of having the token should be well exercise. At least algorand give such room even if asastats is not looking forward to copying such move at least some decisions should be asked from the community to see their perspectives too.

[ipaleka]

The same question has been already answered in our Discord:

Only ASA Stats Team makes actual decisions in the pre-DAO phase. Listening to the community is only a matter of choice. In that regard, the use of the governor seats before the DAO takes place will be an act of governors disavowal, would make irreparable damage to the projected path, and will inevitably lead to failed DAO establishment.

[Bankshelby]

Noted

[ipaleka]

Governor Seats Update 2021-12-12