Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

[Website]: Document new typography components #16

Open
mcturco opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

[Website]: Document new typography components #16

mcturco opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale

Comments

@mcturco
Copy link
Collaborator

mcturco commented Mar 14, 2022

Reason/Context

In a recent push of changes on the @asyncapi/website, I added a few components to help ensure that the typography across the website remains consistent. I think it would be a great start to our design system if we documented these components into this repo.

The components are in this directory on the website -> https://github.com/asyncapi/website/tree/master/components/typography

The documentation needs to match the current state of these components on the website, and in the future we can work on iterating on the design when needed. The goal of this is to be a place where contributors can go to know which components to use in their contributions and how the props work.

Let's also make sure that the components are stored within a folder for the sub-system, Website

Any questions, let me know!

@mcturco mcturco added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 14, 2022
@yashsehgal
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @mcturco I would love to document the components.

@mcturco
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mcturco commented Mar 14, 2022

Awesome, @yashsehgal! Go for it!

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jul 13, 2022
@mcturco mcturco removed the stale label Jul 13, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Mar 15, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants