You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The sole purpose of the current converter is converting AsyncAPI versions from one version to the next.
However, it does not really create a strong community around it nor enable further development of the tool because it is so narrowly focused on one specific area.
So I want to propose that we open up the tool to encompass convert to AsyncAPI meaning that we can have an implementation that converts from OpenAPI, Protobuf, CloudEvents, Postman collections, etc, into AsyncAPI documents. This way we open up a bunch of integration options for people who already use existing standards to switch over or try AsyncAPI.
I like the idea. It may be a good way to push the interest of this package. Plus, converting from OpenAPI, Postman collections, etc. should help increase adoption too.
Reason/Context
The sole purpose of the current converter is converting AsyncAPI versions from one version to the next.
However, it does not really create a strong community around it nor enable further development of the tool because it is so narrowly focused on one specific area.
So I want to propose that we open up the tool to encompass
convert to AsyncAPI
meaning that we can have an implementation that converts from OpenAPI, Protobuf, CloudEvents, Postman collections, etc, into AsyncAPI documents. This way we open up a bunch of integration options for people who already use existing standards to switch over or try AsyncAPI.Each of these implementations can have its own subset of code owners, in a similar fashion as we have achieved with Modelina: https://github.com/asyncapi/modelina/blob/master/CODEOWNERS
How does that idea sound @derberg (even though you leaving 😆), @fmvilas, @magicmatatjahu?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: