-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable validation of an example payload #200
Comments
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request. |
Thanks for the feature proposal! :)
Don't worry, it will be needed. Most likely we will do it as a separate panel where you can select a message/channel/scheme and validate the necessary inputs anyway. |
Thanks for the idea @ThanksForAllTheFish , think this is a great idea ➕ |
Action points:
Before contribution please start discussion to clarify implementation and your questions/problems :) This problem is involved in the OpenForce event. Please don't contribute if you are not participating in this event. If the problem is not solved at the end of the event, feel free to contribute :) |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴 It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation. There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model. Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here. Thank you for your patience ❤️ |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴 It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation. There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model. Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here. Thank you for your patience ❤️ |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴 It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation. There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model. Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here. Thank you for your patience ❤️ |
It would be cool to enable Studio to validate an example payload against the message schema.
This would enable quick prototyping and move into a direction of one tool to rule them all, as currently it is possible to use third party validator like https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: