chore(blog): add february summary #3735
Conversation
thulieblack
requested review from
quetzalliwrites,
TRohit20,
derberg,
akshatnema,
anshgoyalevil,
Mayaleeeee and
asyncapi-bot-eve
as code owners
WalkthroughThis pull request removes the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
asyncapi-bot
requested review from
devilkiller-ag,
sambhavgupta0705,
Aahil13 and
VaishnaviNandakumar
✅ Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3735 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 732 732
=========================================
Hits 732 732 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
markdown/blog/2025-february-summary.md (3)
1-15: Front Matter Consistency Check.
The YAML front matter is well-structured overall. However, note that the title refers to February 2025 while the date is set to March 3, 2025. Please verify that this is intentional (for example, if the post reflects on February but is published in early March) or adjust the date accordingly. Additionally, double-check whether thefeatured: trueproperty is desired here given that other related posts have had this flag removed.
42-58: Profiles Component Review.
The embedded<Profiles profiles={[ ... ]} />component is formatted appropriately to display team member profiles. A static analysis hint flagged a potential word duplication issue near these lines—please check that there isn’t any unintended repetition in the keys or values (for example, the repeated use of "profiles").🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~42-~42: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...api.com/community/tsc) (TSC) members. <Profiles profiles={[ { name: 'Aayush Saini', avat...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
60-61: Newsletter Section Language Suggestion.
In the "Coming in March" section, consider using a more formal alternative to the term "amazing" (e.g., "outstanding" or "exceptional") to maintain a consistent and professional tone throughout the post.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~61-~61: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ....asyncapi.com/newsletter); we have some amazing content you don't want to miss.(AWESOME)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
markdown/blog/2024-annual-summary.md(0 hunks)markdown/blog/2025-february-summary.md(1 hunks)markdown/blog/conference-2024-summary.md(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- markdown/blog/conference-2024-summary.md
- markdown/blog/2024-annual-summary.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
markdown/blog/2025-february-summary.md
[duplication] ~42-~42: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...api.com/community/tsc) (TSC) members. <Profiles profiles={[ { name: 'Aayush Saini', avat...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[style] ~61-~61: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ....asyncapi.com/newsletter); we have some amazing content you don't want to miss.
(AWESOME)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - asyncapi-website
- GitHub Check: Header rules - asyncapi-website
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - asyncapi-website
- GitHub Check: Lighthouse CI
🔇 Additional comments (6)
markdown/blog/2025-february-summary.md (6)
17-21: Community Update Intro and Governance Board Details.
The introductory section clearly outlines the community’s recent structural efforts and the discussions around establishing a Governance Board. The call to participate in the discussion is well-placed. Ensure that the linked discussion remains current and active.
23-26: Mascots Section Clarity.
The "New AsyncAPI Mascots" section is informative and credits the contributor appropriately. Please confirm that the link to Victoria Nduka is correct and that the mascot redesign documentation URL remains valid.
28-29: Bounty Program Announcement Review.
This section is well-written, providing clear instructions for maintainers regarding the bounty program. Verify that the program dates and the linked discussion are accurate and up to date.
31-34: Conference 2025 Details Verification.
The conference section concisely presents the sponsorship call and event details. Please double-check that the financial sponsorship link and the conference website URL are correct and lead to the intended resources.
36-37: Community Discussions Call-to-Action.
The section inviting participation for the AsyncAPI AI Hackathon discussion is clear and directs readers to the appropriate forum. Ensure the link is current and active.
39-41: TSC Members Introduction.
The introduction to the TSC Members is succinct and well-placed, with an effective link to the Technical Steering Committee page.
|
@derberg any additions? |
|
please share:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
markdown/blog/2025-february-summary.md (2)
49-65: Profiles Component Structure
The<Profiles>component is well laid out to present the TSC member details. However, the static analysis tool flagged a possible duplication near line 51 regarding the prop name. Please ensure that usingprofilesas both the component name and prop key is intentional and won’t lead to any rendering issues.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~51-~51: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...api.com/community/tsc) (TSC) members. <Profiles profiles={[ { name: 'Aayush Saini', avat...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
67-68: Newsletter Teaser Refinement
The final section briefly outlines the upcoming March newsletter. Consider replacing the phrase "some amazing content" with a more formal alternative like "compelling content" or "exceptional insights" to maintain a consistent tone.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
markdown/blog/2025-february-summary.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
markdown/blog/2025-february-summary.md
[duplication] ~51-~51: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...api.com/community/tsc) (TSC) members. <Profiles profiles={[ { name: 'Aayush Saini', avat...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[style] ~70-~70: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ....asyncapi.com/newsletter); we have some amazing content you don't want to miss.
(AWESOME)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
markdown/blog/2025-february-summary.md (9)
1-15: Front Matter Precision Check
The metadata is well structured with a descriptive title, clear tags, and proper author information. Please verify if thefeatured: trueflag is intentional for this new post, especially in light of the recent changes where featured metadata was removed from older posts.
17-20: Clear Community Introduction
The introductory paragraphs effectively outline the community's progress by mentioning the establishment of the Community Working Group and the discussion on forming a Governance Board. This aligns well with the PR objectives.
21-24: Mascots Section Clarity
The "New AsyncAPI Mascots" section clearly communicates the completion of the mascot redesign and directs readers to the relevant documentation. Consider confirming if a follow-up blog post on the mascot concepts is scheduled to be published.
26-28: Budget and Voting Update Clarity
This section successfully conveys the approval of the 2025 budget and highlights improvements in TSC voting through reminder messages. Ensure that these updates are fully synchronized with the internal communications and updated workflow details.
29-33: Figure Component Validation
The<Figure />component is used effectively to illustrate the voting reminder UI. Confirm that this MDX/JSX component integrates correctly within the blog framework and that the image path and caption render as expected.
35-36: Bounty Program Announcement
The announcement regarding the AsyncAPI Bounty Program is clear and instructs maintainers well on the submission timeline and discussion link. No changes needed here.
38-41: Conference Sponsorship and Details
The section regarding AsyncAPI Conference 2025 provides clear sponsorship information and conference details. Double-check that the dates and links (e.g., to the prospectus and conference website) are current and correct.
43-44: Community Discussions Highlight
The call-to-action for the AsyncAPI AI Hackathon discussion is straightforward and engaging. It encourages community participation effectively.
46-48: TSC Members Introduction
This brief section invites readers to learn about new Technical Steering Committee members without any ambiguity. It reads well.
|
/rtm |
The PR adds the monthly summary for february.
Summary by CodeRabbit