Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2022. It is now read-only.

Atom update changed styling? #413

Open
alizahid opened this issue May 28, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Atom update changed styling? #413

alizahid opened this issue May 28, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@alizahid
Copy link

I'm not sure which version, but it was a few weeks ago. The issue is with padding and font size of some elements.

In the screenshot, you can see the very compact tree view. I've scoured through editor, core, theme, (even) syntax settings, but I couldn't find a way to make them fat again.

Also, this could be paranoia, but the font of the tab titles looks weird? Is it a different font from the rest of the theme, or just a lighter weight?

Next, you'll see the Settings pane with the correct padding for items. But the packages now lack padding?

Maybe an Atom update changed styling and now the theme looks different? Or am I somehow dreaming all this?

@silvestreh
Copy link
Member

If you updated to Atom 1.17 recently you probably also upgraded to Material UI 2.0 which is a complete rewrite of the theme. Things will look different, so it's not just you.

@alizahid
Copy link
Author

Yes to both. Well, that's a relief. Any chance we'll see an option for the treeview padding soon? Or if you can tell me the class name, I can add it to my stylesheet.

@PeteCrighton
Copy link

+1 for an option for the non-compact tree view.

@silvestreh
Copy link
Member

Yeah, I'm working on a patch to restore the fat tree-view items and an option to make them slim.

@alexindigo
Copy link

It broke my tabs bar, it's either only icons for the horizontal view, for only-one-visible line + scroll for the vertical view.

@anthony-pinskey
Copy link

@silvestreh Do you know if the update also changed how Typescript looks? The syntax highlighting looks so much different in Atom 1.19+ now. I kept thinking something was broken.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants