You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I identified what seems to be a bug in JSEngine setMemoryAllocationCallback
method. In order to reproduce it I used the attached snippet (which is quite
similar to one of the tests included in the tree). Executing the code does not
return the expected results.
buffer@alnitak ~ $ python MemAlloc.py
{}
Moreover the test included in PyV8.py is not really complete
2087 def testMemoryAllocationCallback(self):
2088 alloc = {}
2089
2090 def callback(space, action, size):
2091 alloc[(space, action)] = alloc.setdefault((space, action), 0)
+ size
2092
2093 JSEngine.setMemoryAllocationCallback(callback)
2094
2095 with JSContext() as ctxt:
2096 self.assertEquals({}, alloc)
2097
2098 ctxt.eval("var o = new Array(1000);")
2099
2100 alloc.has_key((JSObjectSpace.Code, JSAllocationAction.alloc))
2101
2102 JSEngine.setMemoryAllocationCallback(None)
As you can see it does not check if the alloc dict is updated as result of the
callback invocation.
Am I missing something or it's really a bug?
Additional details
buffer@alnitak ~/pyv8 $ svn info
Path: .
URL: http://pyv8.googlecode.com/svn/trunk
Repository Root: http://pyv8.googlecode.com/svn
Repository UUID: 3b770cb8-f9e6-11dd-ac5b-dfceb64ead24
Revision: 445
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: [email protected]
Last Changed Rev: 443
Last Changed Date: 2012-06-21 15:38:06 +0200 (Thu, 21 Jun 2012)
buffer@alnitak ~/v8 $ svn info
Path: .
URL: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/trunk
Repository Root: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn
Repository UUID: ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Revision: 12249
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: [email protected]
Last Changed Rev: 12243
Last Changed Date: 2012-08-01 13:14:42 +0200 (Wed, 01 Aug 2012)
Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 1 Aug 2012 at 3:14
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
[email protected]
on 1 Aug 2012 at 3:14Attachments:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: