You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are some tokens that are native to some chains, but were bridged to NEAR/Aurora through some intermediate chains. This is currently the case for UST, it is native from Ethereum, but was bridged to NEAR from Terra. To be explicity in this regard we can have more informative tags with key/values (not all the tags needs to follow this pattern, but it is useful to disambiguate when values can have different meanings).
Example of some tags:
"tags": {
"native:ethereum": {
"name": "Native Ethereum",
"description": "Tokens that are native to Ethereum network"
},
"predecessor:terra": {
"name": "Predecessor Terra",
"description": "Tokens bridged from Terra, but not necessarily native there."
},
"bridge:allbridge": {
"name": "Bridge AllBridge",
"description": "Tokens bridge using allbridge"
},
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like the idea! The only thing I wanted to change, that the UST example it's actually native to Terra but not native to Ethereum. But the token that is used has ERC-20 token in Ethereum.
Having these tags would be definitely useful, even if we don't display these in any front-ends, back-ends could use those to build appropriate usesful and more meaningful representation.
There are some tokens that are native to some chains, but were bridged to NEAR/Aurora through some intermediate chains. This is currently the case for UST, it is native from Ethereum, but was bridged to NEAR from Terra. To be explicity in this regard we can have more informative tags with key/values (not all the tags needs to follow this pattern, but it is useful to disambiguate when values can have different meanings).
Example of some tags:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: