You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 1, 2019. It is now read-only.
My passwordless Lock suddenly stopped working (without any changes on my part) because the new authentication API apparently returns a short access_token and no id_token by default. As a result of that and #130, this change breaks Lock if we rely on the old behavior (incl. using parseHash() and getProfile() that both expect an id_token).
Could this Lock be updated according to the new API?
EDIT: this behavior is happening to a stock configuration of Lock. If we specify audience, the return access_token is "fat" but there's no id_token in either case (and that one is required by parseHash() and getProfile()).
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
False alarm, it turns out that I checked strict OIDC conformity in my client settings, which led to this behavior (namely returning only a short access_token when I don't specify an audience)
Hi all,
My passwordless Lock suddenly stopped working (without any changes on my part) because the new authentication API apparently returns a short access_token and no id_token by default. As a result of that and #130, this change breaks Lock if we rely on the old behavior (incl. using
parseHash()
andgetProfile()
that both expect an id_token).Could this Lock be updated according to the new API?
EDIT: this behavior is happening to a stock configuration of Lock. If we specify audience, the return access_token is "fat" but there's no id_token in either case (and that one is required by
parseHash()
andgetProfile()
).Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: