-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chessboard size #10
Comments
which tool do you want to try? Lidar & camera calibration or just for camera intrinsic? It differs a little bit |
|
Please kindly check the README to see the picture of the chessboard grid. The slight difference between the panel and board does not matter so much, cause there is the last step of visual validation to modify your result. As for the calibration_front file, it's just an intermediate product. You can check the tf_front.yaml for final info |
Thank you for the restoration. By the way, after calculating the tf of lidar and lidar cameras, can we obtain the tf of camera_car? |
Hello, is the order of euler_angle in tf_front.yaml yaw, pitch, roll? |
yes, in the caculate_r_t.cpp file, line 326 ~ 327: Eigen::Quaterniond q_final(q[0], q[1], q[2], q[3]);
Eigen::Vector3d euler_angle = q_final.toRotationMatrix().eulerAngles(2, 1, 0); show that the final output follows the order yaw, pitch, roll |
What do you mean the tf of camera_car? This relative position depends on where you mount the camera on the car. |
Thank you for your reply. The program ran very well in the ros melodic version. I think there were some issues when running the program in the ros noetic and pcl-1.10 environment. The problem is that the viewer cannot display the point cloud. I hope to get your help, thank you very much |
Sorry, there is no plan to make it compatible in different environments. This kind of issue may mainly caused by version changes, you could focus on the difference between APIs to solve the problem. |
Using my three sets of data for calculation, the visualization result shows a small projection error, but the tf_front.yaml result is slightly different from the ideal value. Why is this? Perhaps I should test with more sets of data, tf results [-2.5, -0.165, -0.499, 3.11, -0.08, -1.11], ideal values [-1.82, 0.02, 0.05, 3.141, 0, -1.57] |
Hello, can you share a picture of the chess board grid so that we can make a calibration board for testing. By the way, can the difference between the checkerboard and the back panel (the calibration board attached) be ignored (the calibration board is slightly larger than the checkerboard)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: