-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add function to get blockchain id from warp precompile #2633
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ | ||
// Copyright (C) 2022, Ava Labs, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
// See the file LICENSE for licensing terms. | ||
package precompiles | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
_ "embed" | ||
"fmt" | ||
|
||
"github.com/ava-labs/avalanche-cli/pkg/contract" | ||
"github.com/ava-labs/avalanchego/ids" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func WarpPrecompileGetBlockchainID( | ||
rpcURL string, | ||
) (ids.ID, error) { | ||
out, err := contract.CallToMethod( | ||
rpcURL, | ||
WarpPrecompile, | ||
"getBlockchainID()->(bytes32)", | ||
) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return ids.Empty, err | ||
} | ||
if len(out) == 0 { | ||
return ids.Empty, fmt.Errorf("error at getBlockchainID call: no return value") | ||
} | ||
received, ok := out[0].([32]byte) | ||
if !ok { | ||
return ids.Empty, fmt.Errorf("error at getBlockchainID call, expected ids.ID, got %T", out[0]) | ||
} | ||
return received, nil | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have any sort of framework/etc in place for testing functions like these (ie one's that would require a lot of mocking)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can test this on local network. Do u want to create separate PR for this? @felipemadero
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we don't have framework in place for testing this as unit test. we usually do E2E testing with a local network
deployment, not with a mock. for sure we can consider mocking if we want to really add testing for
all code paths.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
really, how to unit test this stuff, and how to properly tests the commands ux, for example
(prompts, flags paths), needs good design
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
open to freely talk on implementation options
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
regarding testing this specific feature on E2E, we don't have a command to return blockchain ID,
but it is going to be part of a larger feature in the short term.
#2637
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we want to add annotations to the functions to point to the specific E2E?