-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 721
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ACP-176 e2e tests #3749
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add ACP-176 e2e tests #3749
Conversation
// AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED. DO NOT EDIT! | ||
// Generated from hashing.sol by compile-contract.sh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file doesn't seem to have ever been checked in to the repo (even going back to when this file was originally added to the kurtosis e2e tests).
@@ -183,7 +183,12 @@ func SendEthTransaction(tc tests.TestContext, ethClient ethclient.Client, signed | |||
return true | |||
}, DefaultTimeout, DefaultPollingInterval, "failed to see transaction acceptance before timeout") | |||
|
|||
require.Equal(types.ReceiptStatusSuccessful, receipt.Status) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This implied that we would only want to issue successful transactions. The gas consumption in this PR actually expects the transaction to fail.
Why this should be merged
This PR:
post_fortuna
e2e CI run.SuggestGasPrice
as the price APIs do not seem reliable. We should consider changing how the price APIs work from inspecting prior blocks to just returning the next baseFee.How this works
Just modifying tests.
How this was tested
CI
Need to be documented in RELEASES.md?
No.