-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add getters to validator manager #655
Open
geoff-vball
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
getters-validator-manager
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
geoff-vball
force-pushed
the
getters-validator-manager
branch
from
November 27, 2024 15:58
3337c61
to
e7103d2
Compare
geoff-vball
force-pushed
the
getters-validator-manager
branch
from
November 29, 2024 20:51
4abacde
to
bf2ffcc
Compare
geoff-vball
commented
Nov 29, 2024
Comment on lines
-472
to
-479
/** | ||
* @notice Returns the validator's weight. This weight is not guaranteed to be known by the P-Chain | ||
* @return Weight of the validator. If the validation ID does not exist, the weight will be 0. | ||
*/ | ||
function getWeight(bytes32 validationID) external view returns (uint64) { | ||
return getValidator(validationID).weight; | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is redundant, we have an external getting for the Validator
object
geoff-vball
force-pushed
the
getters-validator-manager
branch
from
November 29, 2024 21:03
a407a7f
to
d46a4da
Compare
geoff-vball
requested review from
iansuvak,
richardpringle,
bernard-avalabs,
michaelkaplan13 and
cam-schultz
November 29, 2024 21:32
richardpringle
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why this should be merged
Closes #645
Makes storage getters internal. This isn't the best coding practice, but contract code-size limits made this the most practical option. Child contracts should probably never write to their parent's storage.
How is this documented
N/A