From 82635e5c196e2e53c8ea3edb580d5a99df097153 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vera Xia Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:08:02 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] rename scheduling var name --- source/darwin/dispatch_queue.h | 2 +- source/darwin/dispatch_queue_event_loop.c | 20 +++++++++----------- tests/event_loop_test.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/source/darwin/dispatch_queue.h b/source/darwin/dispatch_queue.h index 320f066ea..dc861bf74 100644 --- a/source/darwin/dispatch_queue.h +++ b/source/darwin/dispatch_queue.h @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct dispatch_scheduling_state { /** * Let's us skip processing an iteration task if one is already in the middle of executing */ - bool is_executing_iteration; + bool will_schedule; /** * List in sorted order by timestamp diff --git a/source/darwin/dispatch_queue_event_loop.c b/source/darwin/dispatch_queue_event_loop.c index f6e4d6415..ec24aaf10 100644 --- a/source/darwin/dispatch_queue_event_loop.c +++ b/source/darwin/dispatch_queue_event_loop.c @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ static struct scheduled_service_entry *s_scheduled_service_entry_new( return entry; } -// may only be called when the dispatch event loop synced data lock is held static void s_scheduled_service_entry_destroy(struct scheduled_service_entry *entry) { if (aws_linked_list_node_is_in_list(&entry->node)) { aws_linked_list_remove(&entry->node); @@ -187,7 +186,7 @@ struct aws_event_loop *aws_event_loop_new_with_dispatch_queue( goto clean_up; } - dispatch_loop->synced_data.scheduling_state.is_executing_iteration = false; + dispatch_loop->synced_data.scheduling_state.will_schedule = false; dispatch_loop->allocator = alloc; dispatch_loop->base_loop = loop; @@ -331,12 +330,11 @@ static bool begin_iteration(struct scheduled_service_entry *entry) { &dispatch_loop->synced_data.cross_thread_tasks, &dispatch_loop->local_cross_thread_tasks); // mark us as running an iteration and remove from the pending list - dispatch_loop->synced_data.scheduling_state.is_executing_iteration = true; + dispatch_loop->synced_data.scheduling_state.will_schedule = true; aws_linked_list_remove(&entry->node); - - should_execute_iteration = true; aws_mutex_unlock(&contxt->lock); + should_execute_iteration = true; return should_execute_iteration; } @@ -351,11 +349,11 @@ static void end_iteration(struct scheduled_service_entry *entry) { return; } - dispatch_loop->synced_data.scheduling_state.is_executing_iteration = false; + dispatch_loop->synced_data.scheduling_state.will_schedule = false; // if there are any cross-thread tasks, reschedule an iteration for now if (!aws_linked_list_empty(&dispatch_loop->synced_data.cross_thread_tasks)) { - // added during service which means nothing was scheduled because is_executing_iteration was true + // added during service which means nothing was scheduled because will_schedule was true s_try_schedule_new_iteration(contxt, 0); } else { // no cross thread tasks, so check internal time-based scheduler @@ -373,8 +371,8 @@ static void end_iteration(struct scheduled_service_entry *entry) { } } - s_scheduled_service_entry_destroy(entry); aws_mutex_unlock(&contxt->lock); + s_scheduled_service_entry_destroy(entry); } // Iteration function that scheduled and executed by the Dispatch Queue API @@ -454,7 +452,7 @@ static void s_schedule_task_common(struct aws_event_loop *event_loop, struct aws aws_mutex_lock(&dispatch_loop->synced_data.context->lock); bool should_schedule = false; - bool is_empty = aws_linked_list_empty(&dispatch_loop->synced_data.cross_thread_tasks); + bool was_empty = aws_linked_list_empty(&dispatch_loop->synced_data.cross_thread_tasks); task->timestamp = run_at_nanos; // As we dont have control to dispatch queue thread, all tasks are treated as cross thread tasks @@ -466,11 +464,11 @@ static void s_schedule_task_common(struct aws_event_loop *event_loop, struct aws * scheduled_service_entry *entry)`). Therefore, as long as there is an executing iteration, we can guaranteed that * the tasks will be scheduled. * - * `is_empty` is used for a quick validation. If the `cross_thread_tasks` is not empty, we must have a running + * `was_empty` is used for a quick validation. If the `cross_thread_tasks` is not empty, we must have a running * iteration that is processing the `cross_thread_tasks`. */ - if (is_empty && !dispatch_loop->synced_data.scheduling_state.is_executing_iteration) { + if (was_empty && !dispatch_loop->synced_data.scheduling_state.will_schedule) { /** If there is no currently running iteration, then we check if we have already scheduled an iteration * scheduled before this task's run time. */ should_schedule = diff --git a/tests/event_loop_test.c b/tests/event_loop_test.c index 477547cad..b03855b91 100644 --- a/tests/event_loop_test.c +++ b/tests/event_loop_test.c @@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ static int s_test_event_loop_canceled_tasks_run_in_el_thread(struct aws_allocato } ASSERT_INT_EQUALS(AWS_TASK_STATUS_CANCELED, task2_args.status); + // DEBUG: test sleep + aws_thread_current_sleep(3); + return AWS_OP_SUCCESS; }