Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[euphrates-0.2.0] Issues regarding PoS integration #174

Open
maurolacy opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[euphrates-0.2.0] Issues regarding PoS integration #174

maurolacy opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@maurolacy
Copy link
Contributor

maurolacy commented Jun 25, 2024

In the euphrates-0.2.0 context, when running this command: stakercli daemon babylon-finality-providers
The following error is now reported:

[btc-staker] error in json rpc client, with http response metadata: (Status: 200 OK, Protocol HTTP/1.1). RPC error -32603 - Internal error: proto: wrong wireType = 2 for field SlashedBabylonHeight

A way to overcome this issue is querying the FPs (both Babylon and consumer) directly from the Babylon chain.

Also, the following command: stakercli daemon list-outputs
Returns the following error:

[btc-staker] post failed: Post "http://127.0.0.1:15812/": EOF

Also, when running this command: stakercli daemon stake

Error: [btc-staker] error in json rpc client, with http response metadata: (Status: 200 OK, Protocol HTTP/1.1). RPC error -32603 - Internal error: error checking if finality provider exists on babylon chain: proto: wrong wireType = 2 for field SlashedBabylonHeight

The same error when querying the FPs through.

@maurolacy maurolacy changed the title Issues regarding PoS integration [euphrates-0.2.0] Issues regarding PoS integration Jun 25, 2024
@maurolacy
Copy link
Contributor Author

maurolacy commented Jun 25, 2024

On further analysis, this seems to be a regression error as these commands worked when tested initially (around May 17).
The error may be caused by changes in other repos, that were not properly tagged (or whose minor versions were indeed breaking).

My main suspect here is the babylon-contract 0.5.x release series.

@SebastianElvis
Copy link
Member

Is this still open?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants