Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make steady state masks more user friendly #61

Open
Nic2020 opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Make steady state masks more user friendly #61

Nic2020 opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Nic2020
Copy link
Member

Nic2020 commented Feb 28, 2024

We should make model.sstate.variable.mask[1] = false work instead of using model.sstate.mask and having to find the correct index.

Also, we should probably rename mask with something more informative like solved or known.

@Nic2020 Nic2020 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 28, 2024
@bbejanov
Copy link
Member

model.sstate.variable.mask already works - I'm not sure since when, but it's definitely there in the current version (v.0.6.3)

As for renaming mask to something more informative, that'd be nice. Problem is that it requires changes in StateSpaceEcon. It's used a lot in the steady state solver. I'm not sure if it's worth it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants