You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The README.md mentions binaries with dynamic dependencies having a hard dependency on /lib/ld-musl-<arch>.so.1 because "the dynamic linker is hardcoded into the binary". But what would happen if /proc/self/exe was used for that hard coded path? Would there be any way to have a binary function both as a normal executable and as it's own dynamic linker?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The README.md mentions binaries with dynamic dependencies having a hard dependency on
/lib/ld-musl-<arch>.so.1
because "the dynamic linker is hardcoded into the binary". But what would happen if/proc/self/exe
was used for that hard coded path? Would there be any way to have a binary function both as a normal executable and as it's own dynamic linker?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: