Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can a binary buisy-box as it's own dynamic loader? #44

Open
bcsgh opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Can a binary buisy-box as it's own dynamic loader? #44

bcsgh opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@bcsgh
Copy link

bcsgh commented Feb 6, 2025

The README.md mentions binaries with dynamic dependencies having a hard dependency on /lib/ld-musl-<arch>.so.1 because "the dynamic linker is hardcoded into the binary". But what would happen if /proc/self/exe was used for that hard coded path? Would there be any way to have a binary function both as a normal executable and as it's own dynamic linker?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant