Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Map > Include layer with parcel / property lines (and ideally info on PIDs on hover) for map page #306

Open
mishraomp opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
research Further investigation is required
Milestone

Comments

@mishraomp
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mishraomp mishraomp added the research Further investigation is required label Nov 7, 2024
@annikaLiving
Copy link

Parcel lines can be leveraged for the map from the PMBC WMS/WFS. If just to draw, WMS should suffice.

The PMBC public WMS BCDC resource listing:
https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/parcelmap-bc-parcel-fabric/resource/959af382-fb31-4f57-b8ea-e6dcb6ce2e0b

WMS
https://openmaps.gov.bc.ca/geo/pub/WHSE_CADASTRE.PMBC_PARCEL_FABRIC_POLY_SVW/ows?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities

Each WMS defaults to one presentation style and do believe it is the outline which is what you are looking for. There is also a single presentation for labels of PIDs if wanting to draw up always when zoomed in. PIDs can be presented in 3 different ways in the data depending how the user wants to see them, if with the dashes and padded zeros, this is the PID_FORMATTED field.

Tips and tricks doc will assist as you can pass many things with a WMS call.
https://bcgov.github.io/data-publication/pages/tips_tricks_webservices.html

@dawnbcgov dawnbcgov changed the title Include layer with parcel / property lines (and ideally info on PIDs on hover) for map page Map > Include layer with parcel / property lines (and ideally info on PIDs on hover) for map page Nov 7, 2024
@dawnbcgov
Copy link
Contributor

This requires more research to validate (ideally including PoC) @AmanBhathal will dedicate a bit more time (but time boxed to 1 week)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
research Further investigation is required
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants