You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current system expects a generic / standardized way how price, supply and backing is derived. In many cases this seems to not work. For example prices for token contracts might not be tracked on DefiLlama or DexScreener but could be derived from an oracle. Or backing might work differently than the standard of having a balance in a contract.
We want to add the capability of supporting any custom logic to derive price, supply and backing for an asset via custom query code per asset which is executed if provided. This will allow to properly cover more assets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current system expects a generic / standardized way how price, supply and backing is derived. In many cases this seems to not work. For example prices for token contracts might not be tracked on DefiLlama or DexScreener but could be derived from an oracle. Or backing might work differently than the standard of having a balance in a contract.
We want to add the capability of supporting any custom logic to derive price, supply and backing for an asset via custom query code per asset which is executed if provided. This will allow to properly cover more assets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: