Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RF to use bids-specification/src/schema/ (via https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-schema?) as much as possible #1202

Closed
yarikoptic opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
effort: high Estimated high effort task impact: high Estimated high impact task

Comments

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Contributor

https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/tree/master/src/schema now (thanks to @tsalo for leading the effort) is now providing a machine readable specification sufficient to validate file paths and basic structure. We should start working on formalizing that specification possible serialization(s) so they would be exported across all versions of BIDS in https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-schema and also possibly in a form most useful to be used by the tools such as bids-validator (see e.g. bids-standard/bids-schema#2). Having formalized serializations across different versions of BIDS could elevate many needs for hardcoding in bids-validator, and also make its reports bids version specific (with hints on what would change whenever validating against current released version etc)

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Mar 1, 2021

@rwblair started on this in #1126, but I think it's still early days.

EDIT: I'm also happy to help with this, but I can't take point because I don't know Javascript.

@tsalo tsalo added effort: high Estimated high effort task impact: high Estimated high impact task labels Mar 1, 2021
@effigies effigies closed this as completed Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
effort: high Estimated high effort task impact: high Estimated high impact task
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants