New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: Fix parse record error verbiage #177

Open

JarvisVon wants to merge 1 commit into bihealth:main from JarvisVon:feature/fix-was-9-but-expected-9-error

JarvisVon commented Jun 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Fix issue where, with 9 columns, an error is returned that states "The line contains an invalid number of fields. Was 9 but expected 9"

Move to use self.expected_fields in the raised exception, to reduce code redundancy and use the value stored in the object itself

Closes #175

JarvisVon changed the title ~~Fix parse record error verbiage~~ fix: Fix parse record error verbiage


          fix: Fix parse record error verbiage

5f87a81

JarvisVon force-pushed the feature/fix-was-9-but-expected-9-error branch from a642d70 to 5f87a81 Compare

June 24, 2024 22:55

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet