Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Awesome, Async support please! #8

Open
TomYeoman opened this issue Mar 29, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

Awesome, Async support please! #8

TomYeoman opened this issue Mar 29, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@TomYeoman
Copy link

Great stuff, love cleaning up my all temp files of x age with a 1 liner :)

Async support would be great, but otherwise one happy user here.

@binarykitchen
Copy link
Owner

thanks mate. yeah, i know. can do when i have some free time. priorities and other works you know.

but tell me, are you asking this because you have performance issues?

@TomYeoman
Copy link
Author

Yeah no worries mate, I might take a look at implementing this myself when I've got a minute. Good to see the project is still active.

I'm planning on using this on a large internal web application which I develop (100k+ daily users) and whilst I haven't ran into any performance related issues yet I just wanted to see if it was still in the pipeline.

@binarykitchen
Copy link
Owner

i see, sweet as. PRs welcome. or i ll do it in few months. or can do it now for a little bounty ;)

@steebchen
Copy link

+1 – I was installing this package when I realized that everything is sync. In a production server where a lot of things happen simultaneously, it's unusable.

@binarykitchen
Copy link
Owner

yeah i know and agree - again, PRs welcome

@d0b1010r
Copy link

I created #13 but ci fails b/c node 0.10 is installed

@binarykitchen
Copy link
Owner

Hello guys, it's been ages. I've ported this cool package to TS, should be easier to implement this request now. PRs welcome ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants