New recipe: gff-to-genbank (grayskull generated) #51977
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mencian has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new file named Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml (1)
31-38: Consider adding functional tests with sample data.While basic import and CLI tests are present, adding functional tests with sample GFF files would provide better validation of the package's core functionality.
Example addition:
commands: - pip check - gff-to-genbank --help + - gff-to-genbank --test-data ${RECIPE_DIR}/test.gff --output test.gb # [not win] requires: - pip + files: + - test.gff
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml (5)
1-6: LGTM! Package metadata follows Conda-forge best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
8-10: LGTM! Source configuration is properly defined with integrity check.
21-29: LGTM! Dependencies are well-defined with appropriate version constraints.
40-45: LGTM! Package metadata is complete with all required fields.
47-49: LGTM! Maintainer information is correctly specified.
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml
Outdated
| run_exports: | ||
| - {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove incorrect run_exports configuration.
The run_exports section references a non-existent package myrecipe. This appears to be copied from a template and should be removed as it's not applicable for this Python package.
- run_exports:
- - {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| run_exports: | |
| - {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml (1)
31-38: Consider enhancing test coverage.While basic tests are present, consider adding a test with a sample GFF file to verify actual conversion functionality.
Would you like me to help create additional test commands with sample data?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml (5)
8-10: LGTM!
Source URL and checksum are properly configured following PyPI package conventions.
21-29: LGTM!
Dependencies and their version constraints are appropriately specified for both build and runtime environments.
40-45: LGTM!
Package metadata is complete with appropriate description, URLs, and license information.
47-49: LGTM!
Maintainer information is correctly specified.
18-19:
Remove unnecessary run_exports configuration.
The run_exports section is typically not needed for Python packages, especially noarch ones. This should be removed to follow Bioconda's best practices.
- run_exports:
- - {{ pin_subpackage("gff-to-genbank", max_pin="x.x") }}
recipes/gff-to-genbank/meta.yaml
Outdated
| {% set name = "gff-to-genbank" %} | ||
| {% set version = "0.0.3" %} | ||
|
|
||
| package: | ||
| name: {{ name|lower }} | ||
| version: {{ version }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Package version needs to be updated to 0.1.0
The recipe currently uses version 0.0.3, but version 0.1.0 is available on PyPI. Please update the version in meta.yaml to match the latest release.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify package version.
The package version is set to 0.0.3, which appears to be an early development version. Please verify this is the latest version available on PyPI.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the latest version on PyPI
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/gff-to-genbank/json | jq -r '.info.version'
Length of output: 79
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
Describe your pull request here
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.