Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
Since the nodes in general are mostly horizontal, I wonder if a left-to-right direction for the tree would fit it better the the current top-to-bottom. This could still benefit from further branch placement optimizations but I think would make the graph more compact |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm putting a +1 on proposal 2: allowing to fold a sub-tree by clicking on a node and maybe giving them a theoretical name that is not reflected in data might be a cool way to simplify things. And maybe even help to encapsulate certain sub-trees with visual feedback before actually moving things around. Another approach would maybe be to have some kind of filter to only show nodes that have returned a state already and/or hide nodes that haven't been ticked for a while. This might be confusing if the speed is too high, though as things would pop in and pop out in large trees. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The tree implemented in #1 works great, however, especially for larger trees it becomes less useful. There are a few challenges here:
In order to solve this, I am proposing a few changes:
I am curious to hear your thoughts!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions