Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Qt for Python (PySide2) as an alternative to PyQt5 #3

Open
Chaz6 opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Support Qt for Python (PySide2) as an alternative to PyQt5 #3

Chaz6 opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Chaz6
Copy link

Chaz6 commented Aug 5, 2020

Qt for Python is the official binding and available under a LGPL license. https://www.qt.io/qt-for-python

@tombonner
Copy link
Contributor

tombonner commented Aug 6, 2020

The reason for using PyQt5 is that IDA Pro uses it for its plugin architecture, and PE Tree started life as an IDA plugin, so it was natural to continue using PyQt5 for the standalone build.

I can certainly consider it though, will have to see if it's just a simple case of changing import statements or if it will require more work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants