- Sponsor
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 269
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unique Lines of Code - Feature Request #355
Comments
That's an interesting thought. I might just do that! |
Added... a primitive version of this into
which gives a number similar to the link mentioned. Now id like to see it as your first link shows broken down by language, but that's next on the list. Still some progress is there. |
Added in a DRYness calculation which indicates how much repetition there is in the code. Higher values indicate less duplicate code hence making it more DRY as a solution. |
Added to all output formats considering this done with the 3.3.0 release. |
@boyter is this being released to the docker image? Neither of these options seem available when pulling |
@gms8994 If the image has the latest it should get it... Now the question is, am I maintaining that, or should I be. Do you mean the one in the repo or some other one? |
The readme mentions a docker image that can be run. I just pulled that, and tried to run |
Just a note that |
Specifically, I see that the dockerfile is checking out a specific version that may not be what's actually wanted? https://github.com/boyter/scc/blob/master/Dockerfile#L7 |
Tweaked the dockerfile just then which should fix it I think. Ill add it to the checklist of things to update when a release is pushed. |
Are there any plans to add a means to compute the unique lines of code? Here is an example at the link blow - please scroll down to the last 2 charts at the bottom of the page for reference:
https://xpra.org/stats/source/
Also there is some discussion here on a related subject:
https://cmcenroe.me/2018/12/14/uloc.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: