Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
959 lines (746 loc) · 32.5 KB

mojo.md

File metadata and controls

959 lines (746 loc) · 32.5 KB
Raw

Mojo "Style" Guide

Mojo is Chrome's new IPC system and provides lots of useful abstractions. These abstractions can make it easier to write code that makes interprocess calls, but can also add significant complexity. Below are some recommendation from Mojo and IPC reviewers for best practices.

For questions, concerns, or suggestions, reach out to [email protected].

For legacy IPC, please see security tips for IPC.

[TOC]

Simplicity

Strive to write simple interfaces. Minimize the amount of cross-process state that needs to be maintained in sync.

Good

interface TeleporterFactory {
  Create(Location start, Location end) => (pending_remote<Teleporter>);
};

interface Teleporter {
  TeleportGoat(Goat) = ();
};

Bad

interface Teleporter {
  // Bad: comments will need to explicitly call out that both locations need to
  // be bound before calling TeleportGoat()!
  //
  // In addition, if untrustworthy processes can talk to trustworthy processes,
  // the Teleporter implementation will need to also handle the case where the
  // Location objects are not yet bound.
  SetStart(Location);
  SetEnd(Location);
  TeleportGoat(Goat) = ();
};

Similarly, strive to make methods focused. Do not overuse optional types.

Good

struct TeleporterStats {
  AnimalStats animal_stats;
  FungiStats fungi_stats;
  GoatStats goat_stats;
  PlantStats plant_stats;
};

interface Teleporter {
  TeleportAnimal(Animal) => ();
  TeleportFungi(Fungi) => ();
  TeleportGoat(Goat) = ();
  TeleportPlant(Plant) => ();

  // TeleporterStats will be have a value if and only if the call was
  // successful.
  GetStats() => (TeleporterStats?);
};

Bad

interface Teleporter {
  // The intent of four optional arguments is unclear: can this call teleport
  // multiple objects of different types at once, or is the caller only
  // supposed to only pass one non-null argument per call?
  Teleport(Animal?, Fungi?, Goat?, Plant?) => ();

  // Does this return all stats if success is true? Or just the categories that
  // the teleporter already has stats for? The intent is uncertain, so wrapping
  // the disparate values into a result struct would be cleaner.
  GetStats() =>
      (bool success, AnimalStats?, FungiStats?, PlantStats?, FungiStats?);
};

Documentation

Mojo structs, interfaces, and methods should all have comments. Make sure the comments cover the "how" and the "why" of using an interface and its methods, and not just the "what". Document preconditions, postconditions, and trust: if an interface is implemented in the browser process and handles requests from the renderer process, this should be mentioned in the comments. Complex features should also have an external README.md that covers the high-level flow of information through interfaces and how they interact to implement the feature.

Good

// Interface for controlling a teleporter. Lives in the browser process, and
// used to implement the Teleportation over Mojo IPC RFC.
interface Teleporter {
  // Teleportation helpers for different taxonomic kingdoms. Teleportation is
  // not complete until the reply callback is invoked. The caller must NOT
  // release the sender side resources until the reply callback runs; releasing
  // the resources early will cause splinching.
  TeleportAnimal(Animal) => ();
  TeleportFungi(Fungi) => ();
  // Goats require a specialized teleportation channel distinct from
  // TeleportAnimal to ensure goatiness isolation.
  TeleportGoat(Goat) => ();
  TeleportPlant(Plant) => ();

  // Returns current teleporter stats. On failure (e.g. a teleportation
  // operation is currently in progress) a null stats object will be returned.
  GetStats() => (TeleporterStats?);
};

Security

Policy should be controlled solely by the browser process. "Policy" can mean any number of things, such as sizes, addresses, permissions, URLs, origins, etc. In an ideal world:

  1. Unprivileged process asks for a capability from the privileged process that owns the resource.
  2. Privileged process applies policy to find an implementation for the capability.
  3. Unprivileged process performs operations on the capability, constrained in scope.

The privileged process must own the capability lifecycle.

Do not trust less privileged processes

This is the overriding principle for all guidelines in this section. When receiving data from a less trusted process, treat the data as if it were generated by a malicious adversary. Message handlers cannot assume that offsets are valid, calculations won't overflow, et cetera.

In general:

  • the browser process is the most privileged process type and therefore, must be maximally suspicious of its IPC inputs
  • the renderer and the ARC++ processes are the least privileged and least trustworthy process types
  • other process types, such as GPU and plugin, fall in between

When passing objects up a privilege gradient (from less → more privileged), the callee must validate the inputs before acting on them. When passing objects down a privilege gradient, such as from browser → renderer, it is OK for the callee to trust the caller.

See also: Do not Handle Impossible Situations

Do not send unnecessary or privilege-presuming data

Each BrowserInterfaceBroker for frames and workers is strongly associated with an origin. Where possible, prefer to use this associated origin rather than sending it over IPC. (See https://crbug.com/734210 and https://crbug.com/775792/).

For example, the browser process must not (fully) trust the renderer's claims about origins. The browser process should already know what origin the renderer is evaluating, and thus should already have this data (for example, see RenderFrameHost::GetLastCommittedOrigin()). Thus, a method that requires passing an origin from the renderer to the browser process has a conceptual error, and quite possibly, a vulnerability.

Note: there are currently subtle races when using GetLastCommittedOrigin() that will be resolved by fixing https://crbug.com/729021.

Similarly, the browser process must not trust the renderer's claims about file pathnames. It would be unsafe for the browser process to save a downloaded file to ~/.bashrc just because the renderer asked. Instead, it would be better for the browser process to:

  1. Kill the renderer if basename(pathname) != pathname, since the renderer is obviously compromised if it makes this mistake.
  2. Defang the basename, by removing leading dots, et cetera. Note that the definition of proper defanging varies per platform.
  3. Prepend its own parent directory to the basename, e.g. ~/Downloads.

TODO(https://crbug.com/779196): Even better would be to implement a C++ type performs the appropriate sanitizations and recommend its usage directly here.

Validate privilege-presuming data received over IPC

If it is not possible to avoid sending privilege-presuming data over IPC (see the previous section), then such data should be verified before being used.

  • Browser process:
    • Use ChildProcessSecurityPolicy's methods like CanAccessDataForOrigin or CanReadFile to verify IPC messages received from less privileged processes.
    • When verification fails, ignore the IPC and terminate the renderer process using mojo::ReportBadMessage (or using mojo::GetBadMessageCallback for messages handled asynchronously). For legacy IPC, the renderer process may be terminated by calling the ReceivedBadMessage function (separate implementations exist for //content, //chrome and other layers).

Do not define unused or unimplemented things

Mojo interfaces often cross privilege boundaries. Having well-defined interfaces that don't contain stubbed out methods or unused parameters makes it easier to understand and evaluate the implications of crossing these boundaries. Several common areas to watch out for:

Do use EnableIf to guard platform-specific constructs

Platform-specific functionality should only be defined on the platforms where it is implemented. Use the Mojo EnableIf annotation to guard definitions that should only be visible in certain build configurations.

Good

// GN file:
mojom("view_bindings") {
  // ...

  enabled_features = []
  if (is_android) {
    enabled_features += [ "is_android" ]
  }
}

// mojom definition:
interface View {
  // ...

  [EnableIf=is_android]
  UpdateBrowserControlsState(bool enable_hiding, bool enable_showing,
                             bool animate);
};

// C++ implementation:
class View : public mojom::View {
 public:
  // ...

#if BUILDFLAG(IS_ANDROID)
  void UpdateBrowserControlsState(bool enable_hiding, bool enable_showing,
                                  bool animate);
#endif
};

Bad

// mojom definition:
interface View {
  // ...

  UpdateBrowserControlsState(bool enable_hiding, bool enable_showing,
                             bool animate);
};

// C++ implementation:
class View : public mojom::View {
 public:
  // ...

#if BUILDFLAG(IS_ANDROID)
  void UpdateBrowserControlsState(bool enable_hiding, bool enable_showing,
                                  bool animate) override;
#else
  void UpdateBrowserControlsState(bool enable_hiding, bool enable_showing,
                                  bool animate) override {
    NOTREACHED();
  }
#endif
};

The EnableIf annotation can be applied to almost anything: imports, interfaces, methods, arguments, constants, structs, struct members, enums, enumerator values, et cetera.

Do not define unimplemented methods

Reviewing IPC requires reviewing a concrete implementation of the Mojo interface, to evaluate how the (possibly untrustworthy) inputs are used, what outputs are produced, et cetera. If a method is not yet implemented, do not define it in the interface.

Bad

// mojom definition:
interface Spaceship {
  EnterHyperspace();
  ExitHyperspace();
};

// C++ implementation:
class SpaceshipPrototype : public mojom::Spaceship {
  void EnterHyperspace() { /* TODO(dcheng): Implement. */ }
  void ExitHyperspace() { /* TODO(dcheng): Implement. */ }
};

Do not define placeholder enumerator values

Do not define placeholder enumerator values like kLast, kMax, kCount, et cetera. Instead, rely on the autogenerated kMaxValue enumerator emitted for Mojo C++ bindings.

For UMA histograms, logging a Mojo enum is simple: simply use the two argument version of UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION:

Good

// mojom definition:
enum GoatStatus {
  kHappy,
  kSad,
  kHungry,
  kGoaty,
};

// C++:
UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("Goat.Status", status);

Using a kCount sentinel complicates switch statements and makes it harder to enforce invariants: code needs to actively enforce that the otherwise invalid kCount sentinel value is not incorrectly passed around.

Bad

// mojom definition:
enum CatStatus {
  kAloof,
  kCount,
};

// C++
switch (cat_status) {
  case CatStatus::kAloof:
    IgnoreHuman();
    break;
  case CatStatus::kCount:
    // this should never happen
}

Defining kLast manually results in ugly casts to perform arithmetic:

Bad

// mojom definition:
enum WhaleStatus {
  kFail,
  kNotFail,
  kLast = kNotFail,
};

// C++:
UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("Whale.Status", status,
                          static_cast<int>(WhaleStatus::kLast) + 1);

For interoperation with legacy IPC, also use kMaxValue rather than defining a custom kLast:

Good

IPC_ENUM_TRAITS_MAX_VALUE(GoatStatus, GoatStatus::kMaxValue);

Use structured types

Where possible, use structured types: this allows the type system to help enforce that the input data is valid. Common ones to watch out for:

  • Files: use mojo_base.mojom.File, not raw descriptor types like HANDLE and int.
  • File paths: use mojo_base.mojom.FilePath, not string.
  • JSON: use mojo_base.mojom.Value, not string.
  • Mojo interfaces: use Interface or Interface&, not handle or handle<message_pipe>.
  • Nonces: use mojo_base.mojom.UnguessableToken, not string.
  • Origins: use url.mojom.Origin, not url.mojom.Url and certainly not string.
  • Time types: use mojo_base.mojom.TimeDelta / mojo_base.mojom.TimeTicks / mojo_base.mojom.Time, not int64 / uint64 / double / et cetera.
  • URLs: use url.mojom.Url, not string.
  • array<uint8> or string and memcpy(): use a Mojo struct and statically define the serialized fields. While memcpy() may be tempting for its simplicity, it can leak info in padding. Even worse, memcpy() can easily copy undocumented fields or newly introduced fields that were never evaluated for safety by the developer or reviewer.

Good

interface ReportingService {
  ReportDeprecation(mojo_base.mojom.TimeTicks time,
                    url.mojom.Url resource,
                    uint32 line_number);
};

Bad

interface ReportingService {
  // Bad: unclear what units |time| is or what |data| contains.
  ReportDeprecation(double time, mojo_base.mojom.Value data);
};

Avoid parallel arrays of data that require the receiver to validate that the arrays have matching lengths. Instead, bundle the data together in a struct so it is impossible to have a mismatch:

Good

struct Pixel {
  int8 reds;
  int8 greens;
  int8 blues;
  int8 alphas;
};

struct Bitmap {
  // Good: it is impossible for there to be mismatched data.
  array<Pixel> pixels;
};

Bad

// Bad: code using this struct will need to validate that all the arrays have
// matching sizes.
struct Bitmap {
  array<int8> reds;
  array<int8> greens;
  array<int8> blues;
  array<int8> alphas;
};

Beware of arithmetic overflow

TODO(dcheng): Import the guidance from the legacy IPC doc.

Signed overflow is undefined in C++. If unsure about whether or not something will overflow, use the safe numeric helpers from //base/numerics!

Good

base::CheckedNumeric<int32_t> size = mojo_rect->width();
size *= mojo_rect.height();
if (!size.IsValid()) {
  mojo::ReportBadMessage("Bad size from renderer!");
}

Bad

// Bad: Signed overflow is undefined in C++!
int32_t size = mojo_rect->width() * mojo_rect.height();

Note that even if the types have defined overflow semantics, it is almost always a good idea to check for overflow.

Good

uint32_t alloc_size;
if (!CheckMul(request->elements(), request->element_size())
         .AssignIfValid(&alloc_size)) {
  // Safe: avoids allocating with a bogus size that overflowed to a smaller than
  // expected value.
  mojo::ReportBadMessage("Invalid allocation size");
}

Element* array = CreateArray(alloc_size);
for (size_t i = 0; i < request->element_size(); ++i) {
  array[i] = PopulateArray(i);
}

Bad

uint32_t alloc_size = request->elements() * request->element_size();

// Dangerous: alloc_size can overflow so that CreateArray allocates too little
// memory. Subsequent assignments will turn into an out-of-bound write!
Element* array = CreateArray(alloc_size);
for (size_t i = 0; i < request->element_size(); ++i) {
  array[i] = PopulateArray(i);
}

All possible message values are semantically valid

When possible, messages should be defined in such a way that all possible values are semantically valid. As a corollary, avoid having the value of one field dictate the validity of other fields.

Good

union CreateTokenResult {
  // Implies success.
  string token;

  // Implies failure.
  string error_message;
};

struct TokenManager {
  CreateToken() => (CreateTokenResult result);
};

Bad

struct TokenManager {
  // Requires caller to handle edge case where |success| is set to true, but
  // |token| is null.
  CreateToken() => (bool success, string? token, string? error_message);

  // Requires caller to handle edge case where both |token| and |error_message|
  // are set, or both are null.
  CreateToken() => (string? token, string? error_message);
};

There are some known exceptions to this rule because mojo does not handle optional primitives.

Allowed because mojo has no support for optional primitives

  struct Foo {
    int32 x;
    bool has_x;  // does the value of `x` have meaning?
    int32 y;
    bool has_y;  // does the value of `y` have meaning?
  };

Another common case where we tolerate imperfect message semantics is with weakly typed integer bitfields.

Handling bitfields

Mojom has no native support for bitfields. There are two common approaches: a type-safe struct of bools which is a bit clunky (preferred) and an integer-based approach (allowed but not preferred).

Type-safe bitfields

struct VehicleBits {
  bool has_car;
  bool has_bicycle;
  bool has_boat;
};

struct Person {
  VehicleBits bits;
};

Integer based approach

struct Person {
  const uint64 kHasCar = 1;
  const uint64 kHasBicycle = 2;
  const uint64 kHasGoat= 4;

  uint32 vehicle_bitfield;
};

In both cases, consider typemapping these mojo types to your preferred C++ construct (e.g. base::StrongAlias<...>, base::EnumSet<...>, etc.) to improve downstream readability and type safety.

Avoid object lifetime issues with self-owned receivers

When creating new Mojo services in the browser process (exposed to the renderer via BrowserInterfaceBrokers in a host object like RenderFrameHostImpl, DedicatedWorkerHost, etc.), one approach is to have the interface implementation be owned by the Receiver using mojo::MakeSelfOwnedReceiver. From the mojo::MakeSelfOwnedReceiver declaration:

// Binds the lifetime of an interface implementation to the lifetime of the
// Receiver. When the Receiver is disconnected (typically by the remote end
// closing the entangled Remote), the implementation will be deleted.

Consider such an interface created in RenderFrameHostImpl, and consider that and a corresponding Remote was created for this interface and owned by RenderFrame. It may seem logical to think that:

  1. (true) The Receiver owns the interface implementation
  2. (true) The lifetime of the Receiver is based on the lifetime of the Remote in the renderer
  3. (true) The Remote is owned by the RenderFrame
  4. (true) The lifetime of the RenderFrameHostImpl is based on the lifetime of the RenderFrame
  5. (true) Destroying the RenderFrame will cause the Remote to be destroyed, ultimately causing the Receiver and the interface implementation to be destroyed. The RenderFrameHostImpl will likely be destroyed at some point as well.
  6. (false) It's safe to assume that RenderFrameHostImpl will outlive the self-owned Receiver and interface implementation

A common mistake based on the last assumption above is to store and use a raw pointer to the RenderFrameHostImpl object in the interface implementation. If the Receiver outlives the RenderFrameHostImpl and uses the pointer to it, a Use-After-Free will occur. One way a malicious site or compromised renderer could make this happen is to generate lots of messages to the interface and then close the frame. The Receiver might have a backlog of messages to process before it gets the message indicating that the renderer's Remote was closed, and the RenderFrameHostImpl can be destroyed in the meantime.

Similarly, it's not safe to assume that the Profile object (and objects owned by it; StoragePartitionImpl, for instance) will outlive the Receiver. This has been observed to be true for at least incognito windows, where a renderer can generate messages, close the page, and cause the entire window to close (assuming no other pages are open), ultimately causing the OffTheRecordProfileImpl object to be destroyed before the Receiver object.

To avoid these types of issues, some solutions include:

  • Using DocumentService or DocumentUserData instead of mojo::MakeSelfOwnedReceiver for document-based interfaces where the interface implementation needs access to a RenderFrameHostImpl object. See the DocumentService declaration for more details.

  • Having the Receiver and/or interface implementation be owned by the object it relies on (for instance, store the Receiver in a private member or use a mojo::UniqueReceiverSet for storing multiple Receiver / interface implementation pairs).

  • Using WeakPtrs instead of raw pointers to provide a way to check whether an object has been destroyed.

C++ Best Practices

Use mojo::WrapCallbackWithDefaultInvokeIfNotRun And mojo::WrapCallbackWithDropHandler sparingly

Mojo provides several convenience helpers to automatically invoke a callback if the callback has not already been invoked in some other way when the callback is destroyed, e.g.:

  {
    base::OnceCallback<int> cb = mojo::WrapCallbackWithDefaultInvokeIfNotRun(
        base::BindOnce([](int) { ... }), -1);
  }  // |cb| is automatically invoked with an argument of -1.

This can be useful for detecting interface errors:

  process->GetMemoryStatistics(
      mojo::WrapCallbackWithDefaultInvokeIfNotRun(
          base::BindOnce(&MemoryProfiler::OnReplyFromRenderer), <failure args>));
  // If the remote process dies, &MemoryProfiler::OnReplyFromRenderer will be
  // invoked with <failure args> when Mojo drops outstanding callbacks due to
  // a connection error on |process|.

However, due to limitations of the current implementation, it's difficult to tell if a callback object has invoke-on-destroy behavior. In general:

  1. Prefer error connection handlers where possible.
  2. Only use the callback helpers for detecting interface errors. These callbacks may be invoked during destruction and must carefully consider receiver object lifetime. For more information, please see the Mojo documentation.

Note that using the callback wrappers in the renderer is often unnecessary. Message pipes are typically closed as part of a Document shutting down; since many Blink objects already inherit blink::ContextLifecycleObserver, it is usually more idiomatic to use this signal to perform any needed cleanup work.

Use StructTraits

Creating a typemap and defining a StructTraits specialization moves the complexity of serialization, deserialization, and validation into a central location. We universally recommend this over defining TypeConverter specializations: when a value fails deserialization, the receiver method will never even be invoked. As a bonus, it also reduces the number of copies during serialization and deserialization. 😄

Good

// In url_gurl_mojom_traits.h:
template <>
struct StructTraits<url::mojom::UrlDataView, GURL> {
  static base::StringPiece url(const GURL& r);

  // If Read() returns false, Mojo will discard the message.
  static bool Read(url::mojom::UrlDataView data, GURL* out);
};

// In url_gurl_mojom_traits.cc:
// Note that methods that aren't simple getters should be defined
// out-of-line to avoid code bloat.
base::StringPiece StructTraits<url::mojom::UrlDataView, GURL>::url(
    const GURL& r) {
  if (r.possibly_invalid_spec().length() > url::kMaxURLChars ||
      !r.is_valid()) {
    return base::StringPiece();
  }
  return base::StringPiece(r.possibly_invalid_spec().c_str(),
                           r.possibly_invalid_spec().length());
}

bool StructTraits<url::mojom::UrlDataView, GURL>::Read(
    url::mojom::UrlDataView data, GURL* out) {
  base::StringPiece url_string;
  if (!data.ReadUrl(&url_string))
    return false;
  if (url_string.length() > url::kMaxURLChars)
    return false;
  *out = GURL(url_string);
  if (!url_string.empty() && !out->is_valid())
    return false;
  return true;
}

Bad

template <>
struct TypeConverter<url::mojom::UrlPtr, GURL> {
  // Inefficient: this copies data once off the wire to create a
  // url.mojom.Url object, then copies it again to create a GURL.
  static GURL Convert(const url::mojom::UrlPtr url) {
    if (url.url.is_empty()) return GURL();
    // Not good: no way to signal errors, so any code that converts the
    // Mojo struct to a GURL will somehow need to check for errors…
    // but it can't even be distinguished from the empty URL case!
    if (url.url.size() > url::kMaxURLChars) return GURL();
    return GURL(url.url);
  }
};

There are also corresponding EnumTraits and UnionTraits specializations for mojo enums and unions respectively.

StructTraits getters should be simple

Where possible, StructTraits should be returning const references or simple read-only views of the data. Having to create temporary data structures during serialization should be rare, and it should be even rarer to mutate the input argument.

Out-of-line complex serialization/deserialization logic

A StructTraits specialization is almost always fully specialized. Only define StructTraits methods inline in the header if the method is a simple getter that returns a reference, pointer, or other simple POD. Define all other methods out-of-line to avoid code bloat.

Do not write one-off functions to convert to/from Mojo types

There are some instances where it is simply not possible to define a StructTraits for type mapping: this commonly occurs with Blink IDL and Oilpan types. In these instances, add a TypeConverter specialization rather than defining a one-off conversion function. This makes it easier to search for and audit code that does potentially risky type conversions.

The use of TypeConverter should be limited as much as possible: ideally, only use it in renderers.

Good

template <>
struct TypeConverter<IDLDictionary, mojom::blink::DictionaryPtr> {
  static IDLDictionary* Convert(const mojom::blink::DictionaryPtr& in) {
    // Note that unlike StructTraits, there is no out-of-band way to signal
    // failure.
    IDLDictionary* out = new IDLDictionary;
    out->int_value = in->int_value;
    out->str_value = in->str_value;
    return out;
  }
};

Bad

// Using a custom one-off function makes this hard to discover in security
// audits.
IDLDictionary* FromMojo(const mojom::blink::DictionaryPtr& in) {
  IDLDictionary* out = new IDLDictionary;
  out->int_value = in->int_value;
  out->str_value = in->str_value;
  return out;
}

Use the proper abstractions

mojo::ReceiverSet implies multiple clients may connect. If this actually isn't the case, please do not use it. For example, if an interface can be rebound, then use the singular mojo::Receiver and simply reset() the existing receiver before reusing it.

Explicitly reject bad input

While validation should be done inside StructTraits specializations when possible, there are situations where additional checks, e.g. overflow checks, are needed outside of StructTraits specializations. Use mojo::ReportBadMessage() or mojo::GetBadMessageCallback() to reject bad input in these situations. Under the hood, this may record UMAs, kill the process sending bad input, et cetera.

  • mojo::ReportBadMessage(): use to report bad IPC input while a message is being dispatched on the stack.
  • mojo::GetBadMessageCallback(): use to generate a callback to report bad IPC input. The callback must be generated while a message is being dispatched on the stack; however, the returned callback may be invoked be freely invoked in asynchronously posted callbacks.

Java Best Practices

Unfortunately, there are no strongly established conventions here. Most code tends to write manual conversion helpers and throw an exception on conversion failure. See NfcTypeConverter.java as one example of how to write conversion code.

General Code Health

Naming Conventions

Place mojo types in <top-level namespace>.mojom. Directories for Mojo traits should be named mojom (preferable) or ipc. Legacy names that are also encountered are public/interfaces, interfaces, or just mojo.

mojom is preferred for consistency between the directory name and the nested namespace name.

Do not handle impossible situations

Do not clutter the code by handling impossible situations. Omitting it makes the invariants clear. This takes two different forms:

  • A less trustworthy process can be compromised by an adversary and send arbitrary data. When processing data from a less trustworthy process, do not attempt to handle this invalid data: just call mojo::ReportBadMessage(). When invoked in the context of processing an IPC from the renderer, this will kill the renderer process.
  • A more trustworthy process must be trusted, by definition. Do not write code to handle impossible situations "just in case" there's a bug. For example, the renderer class content::RenderFrameImpl must always be connected to certain control interfaces in the browser. It does not makes sense to handle a Mojo connection error and try to reconnect: a connection error signals that the browser process is in the process of deleting the frame, and any attempt at reconnecting will never succeed.

Using mojo enums directly when possible

EnumTraits generally do not add much value: incoming Mojo enum values are already validated before typemapping, so it is guaranteed that the input value to EnumTraits<T>::FromMojom() is already a valid enum value, so the method itself is just a bunch of boilerplate to map between two very similarly named, yet slightly different, enums.

To avoid this, prefer to use the Mojo enum directly when possible.

Consider the cost of setting up message pipes

Message pipes are fairly inexpensive, but they are not free either: it takes 6 control messages to establish a message pipe. Keep this in mind: if the interface is used relatively frequently, connecting once and reusing the interface pointer is probably a good idea.

Copy data out of BigBuffer before parsing

BigBuffer uses shared memory to make passing large messages fast. When shmem is backing the message, it may be writable in the sending process while being read in the receiving process. If a BigBuffer is received from an untrustworthy process, you should make a copy of the data before processing it to avoid time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) bugs. The |size()| of the data cannot be manipulated.

Ensure An Explicit Grant For WebUI Bindings

WebUI renderers sometimes need to call special, powerful IPC endpoints in a privileged process. It is important to enforce the constraint that the privileged callee previously created and blessed the calling process as a WebUI process, and not as a (potentially compromised) web renderer or other low-privilege process.

  • Use the standard pattern for instantiating MojoWebUIController. WebUI Mojo interfaces must only be exposed through a MojoWebUIController subclass.
  • If there is external functionality that the WebUI needs, make sure to route it through the Mojo interfaces implemented by the MojoWebUIController, to avoid circumventing access checks.

Not-Yet-Shipped Features Should Be Feature-Checked On The Privileged Side

Sometimes, there will be powerful new features that are not yet turned on by default, such as behind a flag, Finch trial, or origin trial. It is not safe to check for the feature's availability on the renderer side (or in another low-privilege process type). Instead, ensure that the check is done in the process that has power to actually enact the feature. Otherwise, a compromised renderer could opt itself in to the feature! If the feature might not yet be fully developed and safe, vulnerabilities could arise.