You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Nanopb and protobuf-c already have remote plugins and would be very useful to have generated SDK support like the cpp/cmake plugin.
Even if the only "sdk" is to download a zipfile that contains the generated code and dependencies(kind of like the zip available for the cpp/cmake plugin) that would be most excellent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If it helps, we have an archive registry where you can install arbitrary plugin+module combinations, which lends itself nicely to the mentioned languages.
Which is awesome, for sure. And something we started utilizing. But I recall a conversation in slack that made me think it was a good idea to also request "official" support for this like exists for C++, but maybe it's not necesary.
We appreciate you filing an issue, this is the correct place to surface those requests. Outside of bandwidth (and ongoing support/debugging), I don't think there's a technical reason we couldn't add this plugin.
Nanopb and protobuf-c already have remote plugins and would be very useful to have generated SDK support like the cpp/cmake plugin.
Even if the only "sdk" is to download a zipfile that contains the generated code and dependencies(kind of like the zip available for the cpp/cmake plugin) that would be most excellent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: