-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 369
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Predicate filter proposal #1075
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Predicate filter proposal #1075
Conversation
Release/0.16.3
Release/0.16.4
Release/0.17.0
Release/0.17.1
Release/0.18.0
Release/0.18.1
Release/0.18.2
Release/0.19.0
end | ||
|
||
end | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's extract this to a method and add some rspec tests.
…to feature/predicate-filter-wip
@jmoody I moved implementation to new method and added two tests for that new method. I'm not super happy with second one since it can be |
@@ -40,5 +40,36 @@ | |||
/map view marked:'my mark', scrollToViewWithMark failed for:/) | |||
end | |||
end | |||
|
|||
describe ".raw_map.correct_predicate" do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+100 for rspec tests.
There are some more test cases:
We should have a test for those examples to ensure our I think there there is also the There is an example of this floating around somewhere. |
@jmoody there is two methods now: |
selector renamed to operation added < and > as a valid operation
Release/0.19.1
Release/0.19.2
Release/0.20.0
Release/0.20.3
Release/0.20.4
Release/0.20.5
Release/0.21.1
Can you rebase against the latest develop? |
Rebase against develop
Release/0.21.2
Release/0.21.4
Release/0.21.5
Release/0.21.6
related to
#935 and #594