Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[renovatebot] Auto assign random reviewer from Multipass GitHub team #3805

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

sharder996
Copy link
Contributor

@sharder996 sharder996 commented Dec 2, 2024

Unfortunately, this means that @jibel will get the occasional review request.

But, I think this is a better approach than manually listing all Multipass developers and having to maintain it when developers join/leave.

P.S. and @giuliazanchi!

Copy link
Collaborator

@ricab ricab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.94%. Comparing base (a5fefa4) to head (f1f3061).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3805      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.95%   88.94%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         256      256              
  Lines       14579    14583       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        12969    12971       +2     
- Misses       1610     1612       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sharder996 sharder996 added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 02fde37 Dec 9, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@sharder996 sharder996 deleted the renovatebot-auto-assign-random-reviewer branch December 9, 2024 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants