CNCF Annual Review of Carvel as a Sandbox Project #677
Labels
carvel accepted
This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed
discussion
This issue is not a bug or feature and a conversation is needed to find an appropriate resolution
priority/critical-urgent
Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now.
Sandbox projects are subject to an annual review by the TOC. This is intended to be a lightweight process to ensure that projects are on track, and getting the support they need. Process outlined here.
Your annual review should answer the following questions:
---------> https://carvel.devstats.cncf.io/d/8/dashboards?orgId=1&refresh=15m
---------> 10 (9 VMware, 1 converge.io) https://github.com/carvel-dev/carvel/blob/develop/MAINTAINERS.md
---------> Based on our conversation at KubeCon in Amsterdam, those that attend our community meetings, and those that contribute to the project, as well as those that add their details to our pinned issue and adopters file, we have several adopters, including Swisscom and bol.com, which we met in Amsterdam.
Example can be found here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/main/reviews/sandbox/2022/2022-Antrea-annual.md
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: