-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VoI admission test for MACIDs #59
Comments
Yes, this is a very desirable feature. However, I don't know any good algorithm to compute that quantity [edit: this should've said "to evaluate admissibility"] in a multi-agent setting. Unless there's a paper I don't know about, this will have to wait for us to do more theoretical research before we can build it. |
Is the admissibility criterion the same? |
I think that might depend 1) how we define VoI, 2) whether you include the ways that your policy might affect others policy, and 3) what rationality assumptions we place on the other agents. The answer will be yes for some answers to (1-3), but I'm not sure how we should answer such questions. Sorry if that's not a clear answer. |
Thank you -- I see now that the question is not entirely well-formed. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
Describe the solution you'd like
The test for VoI admission currently does not work for multi-agent games.
pycid/pycid/analyze/value_of_information.py
Lines 17 to 20 in 5f78703
It would be nice if this test also worked for models with more than one agent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: