You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
irssi already has the concept of having multiple items in a window with a key bind to toggle between them. for static resources i could set this up with "/query -window", but that gets tedious quickly. also dynamic resources would break it.
so my idea would be "/query somenick" would open a query without irssi/user specifying the resource. so when sending a message, we would send to what ever the "best resource would be" or what the remote server would pick.
we add a command to toggle between all resources ( and of course back to the new mode). we could bind that e.g. meta-v. so if i know i want to write to his mobile client, i could. but i wouldnt end up with N windows anymore to chatting with the same person just because they switch from gajim to conversations and carry their conversation with them because of MAM/carbons.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are there any alternative xmpp plugins for irssi? Any "hacks" to solve this issue? I recently switched from finch to irssi-plugin-xmpp and don't know how to deal with this issue...
irssi already has the concept of having multiple items in a window with a key bind to toggle between them. for static resources i could set this up with "/query -window", but that gets tedious quickly. also dynamic resources would break it.
so my idea would be "/query somenick" would open a query without irssi/user specifying the resource. so when sending a message, we would send to what ever the "best resource would be" or what the remote server would pick.
we add a command to toggle between all resources ( and of course back to the new mode). we could bind that e.g. meta-v. so if i know i want to write to his mobile client, i could. but i wouldnt end up with N windows anymore to chatting with the same person just because they switch from gajim to conversations and carry their conversation with them because of MAM/carbons.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: