You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I came across an issue with "martinize.py" when I ran an MD simulation. Although "martinize.py" is able to detect the HIH residue as an input option, but while writing the ITP file, it is missing the positively charged (+1) D atom from the charged histidine residue.
As a result, there is an inconsistency between the output PDB and ITP files, since the PDB file indeed contains the additional atom too.
Please have a look at this Matini aminoacid topology file.
The following command was passed to the "martinize.py" module.
Cross-posting from the Martini forum
Hello everyone,
I came across an issue with "martinize.py" when I ran an MD simulation. Although "martinize.py" is able to detect the HIH residue as an input option, but while writing the ITP file, it is missing the positively charged (+1) D atom from the charged histidine residue.
As a result, there is an inconsistency between the output PDB and ITP files, since the PDB file indeed contains the additional atom too.
Please have a look at this Matini aminoacid topology file.
The following command was passed to the "martinize.py" module.
python3 martinize.py -f prot.pdb -dssp /usr/bin/dssp -ff elnedyn22p -ef 500 -eu 0.90 -p All -name cg_prot -n cg_prot.ndx -nmap fa_cg_prot.map -x cg_prot.pdb -o cg_prot.top
Thank you very much for reading my query.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: