You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 11, 2021. It is now read-only.
It appears that the "unique values" count for a Lexicon field is based on the number of values in the lexicon table itself, so if the referencing field doesn't contain all of the possible values, the user may think something is broken if, for example, five values are shown but the "unique values" count claims eight values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, this should not be the case. The count method is passed the tree-based queryset so it should not include non-related values. Do running the bare instance.count method in the shell and passing in the tree-based queryset?
It appears that the "unique values" count for a Lexicon field is based on the number of values in the lexicon table itself, so if the referencing field doesn't contain all of the possible values, the user may think something is broken if, for example, five values are shown but the "unique values" count claims eight values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: