layout	title	subtitle	minutes
page	The Unix Shell	Finding Things	15

Learning Objectives {.objectives}

Use grep to select lines from text files that match simple patterns.

Use find to find files whose names match simple patterns.

Use the output of one command as the command-line parameters to another command.

Explain what is meant by "text" and "binary" files, and why many common tools don't handle the latter well.

In the same way that many of us now use "Google" as a verb meaning "to find", Unix programmers often use the word "grep". "grep" is a contraction of "global/regular expression/print", a common sequence of operations in early Unix text editors. It is also the name of a very useful command-line program.

grep finds and prints lines in files that match a pattern. For our examples, we will use a file that contains three haikus taken from a 1998 competition in Salon magazine. For this set of examples we're going to be working in the writing subdirectory:

$ cd
$ cd writing
$ cat haiku.txt

The Tao that is seen
Is not the true Tao, until
You bring fresh toner.

With searching comes loss
and the presence of absence:
"My Thesis" not found.

Yesterday it worked
Today it is not working
Software is like that.

Forever, or Five Years {.callout}

We haven't linked to the original haikus because they don't appear to be on Salon's site any longer. As Jeff Rothenberg said, "Digital information lasts forever --- or five years, whichever comes first."

Let's find lines that contain the word "not":

$ grep not haiku.txt

Is not the true Tao, until
"My Thesis" not found
Today it is not working

Here, not is the pattern we're searching for. It's pretty simple: every alphanumeric character matches against itself. After the pattern comes the name or names of the files we're searching in. The output is the three lines in the file that contain the letters "not".

Let's try a different pattern: "day".

$ grep day haiku.txt

Yesterday it worked
Today it is not working

This time, two lines that include the letters "day" are outputted. However, these letters are contained within larger words. To restrict matches to lines containing the word "day" on its own, we can give grep with the -w flag. This will limit matches to word boundaries.

$ grep -w day haiku.txt

In this case, there aren't any, so grep's output is empty. Sometimes we don't want to search for a single word, but a phrase. This is also easy to do with grep by putting the phrase in quotes.

$ grep -w "is not" haiku.txt

Today it is not working

We've now seen that you don't have to have quotes around single words, but it is useful to use quotes when searching for multiple words. It also helps to make it easier to distinguish between the search term or phrase and the file being searched. We will use quotes in the remaining examples.

Another useful option is -n, which numbers the lines that match:

$ grep -n "it" haiku.txt

5:With searching comes loss
9:Yesterday it worked
10:Today it is not working

Here, we can see that lines 5, 9, and 10 contain the letters "it".

We can combine options (i.e. flags) as we do with other Unix commands. For example, let's find the lines that contain the word "the". We can combine the option -w to find the lines that contain the word "the" and -n to number the lines that match:

$ grep -n -w "the" haiku.txt

2:Is not the true Tao, until
6:and the presence of absence:

Now we want to use the option -i to make our search case-insensitive:

$ grep -n -w -i "the" haiku.txt

1:The Tao that is seen
2:Is not the true Tao, until
6:and the presence of absence:

Now, we want to use the option -v to invert our search, i.e., we want to output the lines that do not contain the word "the".

$ grep -n -w -v "the" haiku.txt

1:The Tao that is seen
3:You bring fresh toner.
4:
5:With searching comes loss
7:"My Thesis" not found.
8:
9:Yesterday it worked
10:Today it is not working
11:Software is like that.

grep has lots of other options. To find out what they are, we can type:

$ grep --help

Usage: grep [OPTION]... PATTERN [FILE]...
Search for PATTERN in each FILE or standard input.
PATTERN is, by default, a basic regular expression (BRE).
Example: grep -i 'hello world' menu.h main.c

Regexp selection and interpretation:
  -E, --extended-regexp     PATTERN is an extended regular expression (ERE)
  -F, --fixed-strings       PATTERN is a set of newline-separated fixed strings
  -G, --basic-regexp        PATTERN is a basic regular expression (BRE)
  -P, --perl-regexp         PATTERN is a Perl regular expression
  -e, --regexp=PATTERN      use PATTERN for matching
  -f, --file=FILE           obtain PATTERN from FILE
  -i, --ignore-case         ignore case distinctions
  -w, --word-regexp         force PATTERN to match only whole words
  -x, --line-regexp         force PATTERN to match only whole lines
  -z, --null-data           a data line ends in 0 byte, not newline

Miscellaneous:
...        ...        ...

Wildcards {.callout}

grep's real power doesn't come from its options, though; it comes from the fact that patterns can include wildcards. (The technical name for these is regular expressions, which is what the "re" in "grep" stands for.) Regular expressions are both complex and powerful; if you want to do complex searches, please look at the lesson on our website. As a taster, we can find lines that have an 'o' in the second position like this:
$ grep -E '^.o' haiku.txt
You bring fresh toner.
Today it is not working
Software is like that.
We use the -E flag and put the pattern in quotes to prevent the shell from trying to interpret it. (If the pattern contained a *, for example, the shell would try to expand it before running grep.) The ^ in the pattern anchors the match to the start of the line. The . matches a single character (just like ? in the shell), while the o matches an actual 'o'.

While grep finds lines in files, the find command finds files themselves. Again, it has a lot of options; to show how the simplest ones work, we'll use the directory tree shown below.

Nelle's writing directory contains one file called haiku.txt and four subdirectories: thesis (which contains a sadly empty file, empty-draft.md), data (which contains two files one.txt and two.txt), a tools directory that contains the programs format and stats, and a subdirectory called old, with a file oldtool.

For our first command, let's run find ..

$ find .

.
./old
./old/.gitkeep
./data
./data/one.txt
./data/two.txt
./tools
./tools/format
./tools/old
./tools/old/oldtool
./tools/stats
./haiku.txt
./thesis
./thesis/empty-draft.md

As always, the . on its own means the current working directory, which is where we want our search to start. find's output is the names of every file and directory under the current working directory. This can seen useless at first but find has many options to filter the output and in this lesson we will discovery some.

The first option in our list is -type d that means "things that are directories". Sure enough, find's output is the names of the five directories in our little tree (including .):

$ find . -type d

./
./data
./thesis
./tools
./tools/old

If we change -type d to -type f, we get a listing of all the files instead:

$ find . -type f

./haiku.txt
./tools/stats
./tools/old/oldtool
./tools/format
./thesis/empty-draft.md
./data/one.txt
./data/two.txt

Now let's try matching by name:

$ find . -name *.txt

./haiku.txt

We expected it to find all the text files, but it only prints out ./haiku.txt. The problem is that the shell expands wildcard characters like * before commands run. Since *.txt in the current directory expands to haiku.txt, the command we actually ran was:

$ find . -name haiku.txt

find did what we asked; we just asked for the wrong thing.

To get what we want, let's do what we did with grep: put *.txt in single quotes to prevent the shell from expanding the * wildcard. This way, find actually gets the pattern *.txt, not the expanded filename haiku.txt:

$ find . -name '*.txt'

./data/one.txt
./data/two.txt
./haiku.txt

Listing vs. Finding {.callout}

ls and find can be made to do similar things given the right options, but under normal circumstances, ls lists everything it can, while find searches for things with certain properties and shows them.

As we said earlier, the command line's power lies in combining tools. We've seen how to do that with pipes; let's look at another technique. As we just saw, find . -name '*.txt' gives us a list of all text files in or below the current directory. How can we combine that with wc -l to count the lines in all those files?

The simplest way is to put the find command inside $():

$ wc -l $(find . -name '*.txt')

11 ./haiku.txt
300 ./data/two.txt
70 ./data/one.txt
381 total

When the shell executes this command, the first thing it does is run whatever is inside the $(). It then replaces the $() expression with that command's output. Since the output of find is the three filenames ./data/one.txt, ./data/two.txt, and ./haiku.txt, the shell constructs the command:

$ wc -l ./data/one.txt ./data/two.txt ./haiku.txt

which is what we wanted. This expansion is exactly what the shell does when it expands wildcards like * and ?, but lets us use any command we want as our own "wildcard".

It's very common to use find and grep together. The first finds files that match a pattern; the second looks for lines inside those files that match another pattern. Here, for example, we can find PDB files that contain iron atoms by looking for the string "FE" in all the .pdb files above the current directory:

$ grep "FE" $(find .. -name '*.pdb')

../data/pdb/heme.pdb:ATOM     25 FE           1      -0.924   0.535  -0.518

Binary Files {.callout}

We have focused exclusively on finding things in text files. What if your data is stored as images, in databases, or in some other format? One option would be to extend tools like grep to handle those formats. This hasn't happened, and probably won't, because there are too many formats to support.

The second option is to convert the data to text, or extract the text-ish bits from the data. This is probably the most common approach, since it only requires people to build one tool per data format (to extract information). On the one hand, it makes simple things easy to do. On the negative side, complex things are usually impossible. For example, it's easy enough to write a program that will extract X and Y dimensions from image files for grep to play with, but how would you write something to find values in a spreadsheet whose cells contained formulas?

The third choice is to recognize that the shell and text processing have their limits, and to use a programming language such as Python instead. When the time comes to do this, don't be too hard on the shell: many modern programming languages, Python included, have borrowed a lot of ideas from it, and imitation is also the sincerest form of praise.

The Unix shell is older than most of the people who use it. It has survived so long because it is one of the most productive programming environments ever created --- maybe even the most productive. Its syntax may be cryptic, but people who have mastered it can experiment with different commands interactively, then use what they have learned to automate their work. Graphical user interfaces may be better at the first, but the shell is still unbeaten at the second. And as Alfred North Whitehead wrote in 1911, "Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking about them."

Using grep {.challenge}
The Tao that is seen
Is not the true Tao, until
You bring fresh toner.

With searching comes loss
and the presence of absence:
"My Thesis" not found.

Yesterday it worked
Today it is not working
Software is like that.
From the above text, contained in the file haiku.txt, which command would result in the following output:
and the presence of absence:
grep "of" haiku.txt

grep -E "of" haiku.txt

grep -w "of" haiku.txt

grep -i "of" haiku.txt

find pipeline reading comprehension {.challenge}

Write a short explanatory comment for the following shell script:
wc -l $(find . -name '*.dat') | sort -n

Matching ose.dat but not temp {}{.challenge}

The -v flag to grep inverts pattern matching, so that only lines which do not match the pattern are printed. Given that, which of the following commands will find all files in /data whose names end in ose.dat (e.g., sucrose.dat or maltose.dat), but do not contain the word temp?

find /data -name '*.dat' | grep ose | grep -v temp

find /data -name ose.dat | grep -v temp

grep -v "temp" $(find /data -name '*ose.dat')

None of the above.

Little Women {.challenge}

You and your friend, having just finished reading Little Women by Louisa May Alcott, are in an argument. Of the four sisters in the book, Jo, Meg, Beth, and Amy, your friend thinks that Jo was the most mentioned. You, however, are certain it was Amy. Luckily, you have a file LittleWomen.txt containing the full text of the novel. Using afor loop, how would you tabulate the number of times each of the four sisters is mentioned? Hint: one solution might employ the commands grep and wc and a |, while another might utilize grep options.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

06-find.md

06-find.md

Learning Objectives {.objectives}

Forever, or Five Years {.callout}

Wildcards {.callout}

Listing vs. Finding {.callout}

Binary Files {.callout}

Using grep {.challenge}

`find` pipeline reading comprehension {.challenge}

Matching `ose.dat` but not `temp` {}{.challenge}

Little Women {.challenge}

Files

06-find.md

Latest commit

History

06-find.md

File metadata and controls

Learning Objectives {.objectives}

Forever, or Five Years {.callout}

Wildcards {.callout}

Listing vs. Finding {.callout}

Binary Files {.callout}

Using grep {.challenge}

find pipeline reading comprehension {.challenge}

Matching ose.dat but not temp {}{.challenge}

Little Women {.challenge}

`find` pipeline reading comprehension {.challenge}

Matching `ose.dat` but not `temp` {}{.challenge}