You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I'm seeing that that we are correctly extracting the following informations from the iso19139:
# 'aggregate-dataset-identifier'
# 'aggregate-dataset-name'
# 'aggregate-dataset-type'
But then the base implementation of the get_package is not providing a corresponding map as package.
I was going to implement these as resources but I think it would be formally better IF we can start using relations between packages.
The fields above are used normally to link existing metadata to the metada shipping these informations, so we may use aggregate-dataset-identifier to reference other metadata by GUID
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I'm seeing that that we are correctly extracting the following informations from the iso19139:
# 'aggregate-dataset-identifier'
# 'aggregate-dataset-name'
# 'aggregate-dataset-type'
But then the base implementation of the get_package is not providing a corresponding map as package.
I was going to implement these as resources but I think it would be formally better IF we can start using relations between packages.
The fields above are used normally to link existing metadata to the metada shipping these informations, so we may use aggregate-dataset-identifier to reference other metadata by GUID
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: