-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unclustered energy variations on T1Smear MET #259
Comments
It does cause confusion! Also because the naming is different with respect to the previous version of the tool, which we used in our analysis. |
Yes, the naming is unfortunately quite different from earlier. I think except the unclustered energy uncertainties, uncertainties on T1 and T1Smear MET should be calculated correctly. With the current version of the code, I believe unclustered energy uncertainties are calculated correctly for T1 MET but not for T1Smear MET. |
As PR #244 is merged, the JME uncertainty module calculates and saves uncertainties for T1 and T1Smear MET separately. This is being done for JES/JER uncertainties, but the unclustered energy variations remain untouched, they are calculated only for T1 MET in 1, but not for T1Smear MET. I believe this is causing two issues:
Unclustered energy variations are no longer applicable to use for analyses where smearing corrections are used.
A new naming scheme is introduced for the branches where JES/JER uncs are saved, but the branch names for unclustered energy ones remain as in the old version, which might cause additional confusion.
Can we make this calculation for T1 and T1Smear MET separately, and save them separately, as we're now doing with JES/JER uncertainties? I can also prepare a PR for this as well, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: