-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add lowcode-simple-table #280
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request involve the addition of a new dependency, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"lowcode-simple-table": { | ||
"version": "*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider specifying a version range for lowcode-simple-table
.
Adding the lowcode-simple-table
dependency aligns with the PR objective of introducing a low-code related component package. However, it's recommended to specify a version range (e.g., ^1.2.3
) instead of *
to avoid potential breaking changes from future releases.
"version": "*" | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cansin-blogdata
seems unrelated to the PR changes.
The existing cansin-blogdata
dependency does not appear to be directly related to the introduction of the low-code component package. Similar to the feedback on lowcode-simple-table
, consider specifying a version range instead of *
for cansin-blogdata
to maintain consistency and avoid potential issues.
[skip ci] ## [1.129.0](v1.128.0...v1.129.0) (2024-09-18) ### Features * add lowcode-simple-table ([#280](#280)) ([dc30b5a](dc30b5a))
添加低代码相关自用组件包
Summary by CodeRabbit