Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

About RocketCore.scala issue #5

Open
kai413629305 opened this issue Nov 13, 2018 · 8 comments
Open

About RocketCore.scala issue #5

kai413629305 opened this issue Nov 13, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@kai413629305
Copy link

Is there an analysis of RocketCore.scala in the rocket folder? Or is there more analysis of other scala files in the rocket folder?

@wsong83
Copy link
Member

wsong83 commented Nov 14, 2018

Since what bothered me most was the Tilelink and the deplomacy, I did not spend much time on the Rocket core itself. Feel free to contribute if you get any spare time, just in case.

@kai413629305
Copy link
Author

It is a regrettable news, because recently I am looking for in-depth research on rocket-chip data, but your resources are well written, thank you.

@Readm
Copy link

Readm commented Nov 17, 2018

Hello, I'm writing some note about the RocketCore.scala, and @wsong83 had invited me privately to add the notes in to this repo. The bad news is I'm not very confident about the analysis and I do not have much time to update them. A preview is http://readm.tech/2018/03/15/riscv-bypass/ and a index in chinese http://readm.tech/2018/02/19/rocket-0/

If you like it, i will continue the work. Welcome to discuss it with me.

@kai413629305
Copy link
Author

Hello, I'm writing some note about the RocketCore.scala, and @wsong83 had invited me privately to add the notes in to this repo. The bad news is I'm not very confident about the analysis and I do not have much time to update them. A preview is http://readm.tech/2018/03/15/riscv-bypass/ and a index in chinese http://readm.tech/2018/02/19/rocket-0/

If you like it, i will continue the work. Welcome to discuss it with me.

@Readm Your information is very useful, thank you very much for your Rocket Core source code notes. I am a newbie and want to join Rocket-chip. May I have the honor to get your WeChat?

@Readm
Copy link

Readm commented Nov 19, 2018

Hello, I'm writing some note about the RocketCore.scala, and @wsong83 had invited me privately to add the notes in to this repo. The bad news is I'm not very confident about the analysis and I do not have much time to update them. A preview is http://readm.tech/2018/03/15/riscv-bypass/ and a index in chinese http://readm.tech/2018/02/19/rocket-0/
If you like it, i will continue the work. Welcome to discuss it with me.

@Readm Your information is very useful, thank you very much for your Rocket Core source code notes. I am a newbie and want to join Rocket-chip. May I have the honor to get your WeChat?

OK, search lijinfengzi in WeChat.

@Readm
Copy link

Readm commented Nov 21, 2018

Since what bothered me most was the Tilelink and the deplomacy, I did not spend much time on the Rocket core itself. Feel free to contribute if you get any spare time, just in case.

@wsong83 Hello, I'v wrote some notes of Rocket Core. I remember you invited me to join this work in wechat group. I'm not sure my notes fit this repo. If so, I will move them here. A preview at rocket core

Any suggestions? Thank you.

@wsong83
Copy link
Member

wsong83 commented Nov 21, 2018

I set up this rocket-chip-read repo to comment on the Chisel code of the rocket-chip project. Although describing the underlying logic/thoery/mechanism of individual blocks is important, it does not fit into a code comment set-up.

What my feeling is, your blog posts are great and should remain as they are. Some of the content of your blog posts, especially those for certain Chisel modules, can be further summarized and PRed into this repo as the comment/description of the corresponding modules.

For open-source projects, it is always making the best impact with the minimal effort. Normally people contribute only when the contributed work is also a part of their daily work. Do not feel like, if you begin to do this, you then need to finish them all. Just contribute whatever you like, capable, and have the time to do. Any little bit is appreciated.

Many thanks.

@Readm
Copy link

Readm commented Nov 21, 2018

I set up this rocket-chip-read repo to comment on the Chisel code of the rocket-chip project. Although describing the underlying logic/thoery/mechanism of individual blocks is important, it does not fit into a code comment set-up.

What my feeling is, your blog posts are great and should remain as they are. Some of the content of your blog posts, especially those for certain Chisel modules, can be further summarized and PRed into this repo as the comment/description of the corresponding modules.

For open-source projects, it is always making the best impact with the minimal effort. Normally people contribute only when the contributed work is also a part of their daily work. Do not feel like, if you begin to do this, you then need to finish them all. Just contribute whatever you like, capable, and have the time to do. Any little bit is appreciated.

Many thanks.

Thanks for you advice!

I apologize for that I didn't read the this repo much : )

Indeed, my note do not fit the style of this repo. I saw the difference. I just to want record my thinking and clues when i read them, and help my group or someone else. In fact, I've done my works on it, and may continue to write some note afterwards, out of interest. Honestly, I may not be able to write the correct descriptions like that in this repo, since I'm a "layman" to hardware design.

Tell me if the RocketCore is finished and you want me to PR my note here. Or somewhere else to share them.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants