Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: unable to use Coolify - ERROR The [public/storage] link already exists #2701

Closed
venkadeshshiva opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@venkadeshshiva
Copy link

Description

unable to use Coolify. Coolify container restarting with error.

Minimal Reproduction (if possible, example repository)

install and run

Exception or Error

To support Server Side Up projects visit:
https://serversideup.net/sponsor

GID/UID

User uid: 9999
User gid: 9999

🏃‍♂️ Checking for Laravel automations...
🔐 Linking the storage...
🔓 SSL_MODE has been DISABLED, setting the web server to work in HTTP only...

ERROR The [public/storage] link already exists.

In PhpRedisConnector.php line 159:

No route to host

s6-rc: warning: unable to start service db-migration: command exited 1
[27-Jun-2024 07:41:55] NOTICE: fpm is running, pid 100
[27-Jun-2024 07:41:55] NOTICE: ready to handle connections
[27-Jun-2024 07:41:55] NOTICE: systemd monitor interval set to 10000ms
/run/s6/basedir/scripts/rc.init: warning: s6-rc failed to properly bring all the services up! Check your logs (in /run/uncaught-logs/current if you have in-container logging) for more information.
prog: fatal: stopping the container.
[27-Jun-2024 07:41:56] NOTICE: Terminating ...
[27-Jun-2024 07:41:56] NOTICE: exiting, bye-bye!

Version

4.0.0-beta.306

@venkadeshshiva venkadeshshiva changed the title [Bug]: unable to use Coolify [Bug]: unable to use Coolify - ERROR The [public/storage] link already exists Jun 27, 2024
@coodyme
Copy link

coodyme commented Jul 12, 2024

same error here

@egorguscha
Copy link

egorguscha commented Jul 12, 2024

its happening in all versions, I cant setup coolify properly

@venkadeshshiva
Copy link
Author

if i disable firewall it works property. I don't know what is happening in behind the scene.

@nikoksr
Copy link

nikoksr commented Jul 12, 2024

I encountered a similar issue related to the way filtering was handled on my host system. I installed Docker on a default Ubuntu server, which comes with nftables enabled by default. Docker does not natively support nftables (see here), as its network stack was developed when iptables were the default firewall solution for Linux. iptables are the predecessor of nftables.

In my case, the following line in my nftables.conf caused the problem:

flush ruleset

This command flushes all previously set rules to ensure reproducible and consistent behavior. However, it also removes any rules set by Docker, which are necessary for container communication. As a result, containers fail to communicate with each other.

There are a few solutions to this problem. One that worked for me was replacing Docker with podman and podman-docker, as Podman natively supports nftables. Another potential solution is described here, or simply switching to an OS that doesn't use nftables by default.

Disclaimer: I can't remember exactly if this in fact was my solution to this or another problem.

@peaklabs-dev
Copy link
Member

The installation script, init and so on changed a tone, so this issue should be fixed now. If this issue persists, feel free to reopen or create a new issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants