Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cannot reproduce the results in the paper #1

Open
d12306 opened this issue Apr 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

cannot reproduce the results in the paper #1

d12306 opened this issue Apr 4, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@d12306
Copy link

d12306 commented Apr 4, 2020

Hi, @cuishuhao , thanks for your code implementations, but when I tried to reproduce the results in the paper using the office-31 dataset, specifically from the dslr dataset to the amazon dataset, the final acc is around 69% (CDAN+BNM), can you try to reproduce the results using this version of code and release it here? are there any hyperparameters that you change in this transferring scenario?

Thanks,

@cuishuhao
Copy link
Owner

Hi, I ran eight experiments last day, but I still could not reproduce your results of D->A. I update the code for better reproducing.
I tried on pytorch=1.0.1 and 1.3.1 and the results are similar to the paper.
The iteration number is set to 5000 on D->W and W->D, and 10000 on others. While I do not think it matters.
Now, the code could print the random number. If you could still obtain such awful results, please tell me the random number and environment.

@d12306
Copy link
Author

d12306 commented Apr 6, 2020

@cuishuhao , thanks for your update, I guess it is caused by the initialization and the number of training steps, now I obtain an acc that is close to the one in the paper. Thanks, great work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants